Rivadeneyra-Sicilia Ana, Minué Lorenzo Sergio, Artundo Purroy Carlos, Márquez Calderón Soledad
Université de Bordeaux, ISPED, Burdeos, Francia.
Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Junta de Andalucía, Granada, España.
Gac Sanit. 2014 Jun;28 Suppl 1:12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.03.006.
The evidence available on the impact of previous crises on health reveals different patterns attributable to study designs, the characteristics of each crisis, and other factors related to the socioeconomic and political context. There is greater consensus on the mediating role of government policy responses to financial crises. These responses may magnify or mitigate the adverse effects of crises on population health. Some studies have shown a significant deterioration in some health indicators in the context of the current crisis, mainly in relation to mental health and communicable diseases. Alcohol and tobacco use have also declined in some European countries. In addition, this crisis is being used by some governments to push reforms aimed at privatizing health services, thereby restricting the right to health and healthcare. Specifically, action is being taken on the three axes that determine health system financing: the population covered, the scope of services, and the share of the costs covered. These measures are often arbitrarily implemented based on ideological decisions rather than on the available evidence and therefore adverse consequences are to be expected in terms of financial protection, efficiency, and equity.
关于以往危机对健康影响的现有证据显示,由于研究设计、每次危机的特点以及与社会经济和政治背景相关的其他因素,呈现出不同的模式。对于政府应对金融危机的政策反应的中介作用,存在更多共识。这些反应可能会放大或减轻危机对人口健康的不利影响。一些研究表明,在当前危机背景下,一些健康指标出现了显著恶化,主要涉及心理健康和传染病。一些欧洲国家的酒精和烟草使用也有所下降。此外,一些政府利用这场危机推动旨在使卫生服务私有化的改革,从而限制健康权和医疗保健权。具体而言,正在围绕决定卫生系统融资的三个轴心采取行动:覆盖的人群、服务范围以及费用分担比例。这些措施往往基于意识形态决定而随意实施,而非依据现有证据,因此在财务保护、效率和公平性方面预计会产生不良后果。