Suppr超能文献

文化与精神科评估:为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版实施文化定式评估

Culture and psychiatric evaluation: operationalizing cultural formulation for DSM-5.

作者信息

Lewis-Fernández Roberto, Aggarwal Neil Krishan, Bäärnhielm Sofie, Rohlof Hans, Kirmayer Laurence J, Weiss Mitchell G, Jadhav Sushrut, Hinton Ladson, Alarcón Renato D, Bhugra Dinesh, Groen Simon, van Dijk Rob, Qureshi Adil, Collazos Francisco, Rousseau Cécile, Caballero Luis, Ramos Mar, Lu Francis

出版信息

Psychiatry. 2014 Summer;77(2):130-54. doi: 10.1521/psyc.2014.77.2.130.

Abstract

The Outline for Cultural Formulation (OCF) introduced with DSM-IV provided a framework for clinicians to organize cultural information relevant to diagnostic assessment and treatment planning. However, use of the OCF has been inconsistent, raising questions about the need for guidance on implementation, training, and application in diverse settings. To address this need, DSM-5 introduced a cultural formulation interview (CFI) that operationalizes the process of data collection for the OCF. The CFI includes patient and informant versions and 12 supplementary modules addressing specific domains of the OCF. This article summarizes the literature reviews and analyses of experience with the OCF conducted by the DSM-5 Cross-Cultural Issues Subgroup (DCCIS) that informed the development of the CFI. We review the history and contents of the DSM-IV OCF, its use in training programs, and previous attempts to render it operational through questionnaires, protocols, and semi-structured interview formats. Results of research based on the OCF are discussed. For each domain of the OCF, we summarize findings from the DCCIS that led to content revision and operationalization in the CFI. The conclusion discusses training and implementation issues essential to service delivery.

摘要

随《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)引入的文化构思大纲(OCF)为临床医生提供了一个框架,用于整理与诊断评估和治疗计划相关的文化信息。然而,OCF的使用并不一致,这引发了关于在不同环境中实施、培训和应用方面是否需要指导的问题。为满足这一需求,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)引入了文化构思访谈(CFI),该访谈将OCF的数据收集过程进行了实际操作化。CFI包括患者版和知情者版,以及12个补充模块,涉及OCF的特定领域。本文总结了DSM-5跨文化问题小组(DCCIS)对OCF进行的文献综述和经验分析,这些为CFI的制定提供了依据。我们回顾了DSM-IV OCF的历史和内容、其在培训项目中的使用情况,以及此前通过问卷、协议和半结构化访谈形式使其实际可用的尝试。还讨论了基于OCF的研究结果。对于OCF的每个领域,我们总结了DCCIS的研究结果,这些结果导致了CFI中的内容修订和实际操作化。结论部分讨论了服务提供中至关重要的培训和实施问题。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
A close look at sociality in DSM criteria.仔细观察 DSM 标准中的社交性。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;59(3):475-492. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02568-z. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Sociocultural Framework for Psychiatric Case Formulation.精神科病例构念的社会文化框架。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2024 Jan 1;212(1):16-27. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001721. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for Training in Cultural Psychiatry.文化精神病学培训指南。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;66(2):195-246. doi: 10.1177/0706743720907505. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
The Elephant Vanishes: impact of human-elephant conflict on people's wellbeing.大象消失了:人象冲突对人们福祉的影响。
Health Place. 2012 Nov;18(6):1356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Jul 8.
10
Religious competence as cultural competence.宗教能力即文化能力。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;49(2):245-60. doi: 10.1177/1363461512439088. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验