• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决定颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间长短的因素代表了避免经济损失的机会。

Factors that determine the length of stay after carotid endarterectomy represent opportunities to avoid financial losses.

作者信息

Glaser Julia, Kuwayama David, Stone David, Schanzer Andres, Eldrup-Jorgensen Jens, Powell Richard, Stanley Andrew, Nolan Brian

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):966-72.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.292. Epub 2014 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.292
PMID:24865784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A postoperative length of stay (LOS) >1 day after elective surgery incurs financial losses for hospitals, given fixed diagnosis-related group-based reimbursement. We sought to identify factors leading to a prolonged LOS (>1 postoperative day) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA in 23 centers of the Vascular Study Group of New England between 2003 and 2011 (n = 8860) were analyzed. Only elective, primary CEAs were analyzed, leaving a study cohort of 7108 procedures. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of a postoperative LOS >1 day. A Knaus-Wagner chi-pie analysis was performed to determine the relative contributions of each significant covariate to a postoperative LOS >1 day.

RESULTS

A postoperative LOS >1 day occurred in 17.5% of the sample (n = 1244). The average LOS was 1.4 days (range, 1-91 days; median, 1). There was significant variation in rates of postoperative LOS >1 day across centers (range, 5%-100%; P < .001). Factors independently associated with a postoperative LOS >1 day and their percentage contribution to the prediction model included the need for postoperative intravenous medications for hypertension or hypotension (26%), any major adverse event (MAE) postoperatively (21%), low-volume (<15 CEAs per year) surgeons (28%), increasing age (7%), female gender (4%), positive result on a preoperative stress test (3%), preoperative major stroke ≤30 days (2%), medication-dependent diabetes (1%), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1%), history of congestive heart failure (1%), and CEA performed on Friday (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain patient characteristics predispose to a postoperative LOS >1 day after elective CEA. However, patient characteristics play only a modest (17%) role in determining LOS. The need for postoperative blood pressure control and MAEs are the biggest drivers of postoperative LOS >1 day, but system factors, such as low operative volume, contribute substantially to postoperative LOS >1 day, independent of MAEs. These findings can be used to guide quality improvement efforts designed to reduce LOS after elective CEA.

摘要

背景

鉴于基于诊断相关分组的固定报销方式,择期手术后住院时间(LOS)超过1天会给医院带来经济损失。我们试图确定导致颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后住院时间延长(术后超过1天)的因素。

方法

对2003年至2011年期间在新英格兰血管研究组23个中心接受CEA手术的患者(n = 8860)进行分析。仅分析择期、初次CEA手术,最终研究队列包括7108例手术。进行分层多变量逻辑回归分析以确定术后住院时间超过1天的预测因素。进行Knaus-Wagner卡方分析以确定每个显著协变量对术后住院时间超过1天的相对贡献。

结果

样本中17.5%(n = 1244)的患者术后住院时间超过1天。平均住院时间为1.4天(范围1 - 91天;中位数为1天)。各中心术后住院时间超过1天的发生率存在显著差异(范围5% - 100%;P <.001)。与术后住院时间超过1天独立相关的因素及其在预测模型中的贡献百分比包括术后因高血压或低血压需要静脉用药(26%)、术后发生任何重大不良事件(MAE)(21%)、手术量少(每年<15例CEA手术)的外科医生(28%)、年龄增加(7%)、女性(4%)、术前应激试验结果阳性(3%)、术前30天内发生重大卒中(2%)、药物依赖型糖尿病(1%)、严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(1%)、充血性心力衰竭病史(1%)以及在周五进行CEA手术(2%)。

结论

某些患者特征易导致择期CEA术后住院时间超过1天。然而,患者特征在确定住院时间方面仅起适度作用(17%)。术后血压控制的需求和重大不良事件是术后住院时间超过1天的最大驱动因素,但诸如手术量少等系统因素在术后住院时间超过1天方面也有很大贡献,且独立于重大不良事件。这些发现可用于指导旨在减少择期CEA术后住院时间的质量改进工作。

相似文献

1
Factors that determine the length of stay after carotid endarterectomy represent opportunities to avoid financial losses.决定颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间长短的因素代表了避免经济损失的机会。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):966-72.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.292. Epub 2014 May 24.
2
Contemporary predictors of extended postoperative hospital length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术术后延长住院时间的当代预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.090. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
3
Modifiable Factors Leading to Increased Length of Stay after Carotid Endarterectomy.导致颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间延长的可改变因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.126. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
Carotid Endarterectomy Performed before the Weekend is Associated with Increased Length of Stay.周末前进行颈动脉内膜切除术与住院时间延长有关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;48:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.028. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Carotid endarterectomy is more cost-effective than carotid artery stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术比颈动脉支架置入术更具成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.045. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
Predictors and consequences of unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后30天内非计划再次入院的预测因素及后果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;60(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.055. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
7
The need for treatment of hemodynamic instability following carotid endarterectomy is associated with increased perioperative and 1-year morbidity and mortality.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后出现血流动力学不稳定的治疗需求与围手术期和 1 年的发病率和死亡率增加有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;59(1):16-24.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
8
Factors affecting operative time and outcome of carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量改进计划中影响颈动脉内膜切除术手术时间和结果的因素
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1100-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.426. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Predictors of prolonged length of stay after major elective head and neck surgery.择期重大头颈手术后住院时间延长的预测因素。
Laryngoscope. 2007 Oct;117(10):1756-63. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3180de4d85.
10
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Perioperative stroke.围手术期卒中。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 Jan 18;10(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00487-6.
3
Implementation of Predictive Algorithms for the Study of the Endarterectomy LOS.用于研究动脉内膜切除术住院时间的预测算法的实施
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 12;9(10):546. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100546.
4
Preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of patients undergoing major vascular surgery.大血管手术患者的术前评估和围手术期管理。
Vasc Med. 2022 Oct;27(5):496-512. doi: 10.1177/1358863X221122552.
5
In-hospital outcomes alone underestimate rates of 30-day major adverse events after carotid artery stenting.仅院内结局就低估了颈动脉支架置入术后 30 天主要不良事件的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1233-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.201. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Evaluation of regional variations in length of stay after elective, uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy in North America.评估北美择期、非复杂颈动脉内膜切除术患者的住院时间的区域差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):536-544.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.071. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的院内转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.029. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Impact of rural versus urban geographic location on length of stay after carotid endarterectomy.农村与城市地理位置对颈动脉内膜切除术后住院时间的影响。
Vascular. 2019 Aug;27(4):390-396. doi: 10.1177/1708538119835402. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Weekend Effect in Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的周末效应。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2945-2952. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022305.
10
Regional variation in patient outcomes in carotid artery disease treatment in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中颈动脉疾病治疗患者结局的区域性差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):749-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.080. Epub 2018 Mar 20.