• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾车时使用手机:来自观察性调查的结果。

Phone use while driving: results from an observational survey.

机构信息

a Centre for Automotive Safety Research , The University of Adelaide , South Australia , Australia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(6):537-41. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.843075.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2013.843075
PMID:24867565
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to quantify the level of handheld phone use when driving in South Australia. The study also sought to investigate any driver, site, and vehicle characteristics associated with handheld phone use to inform countermeasure development and publicity campaigns.

METHOD

An on-road observational survey of handheld phone use was undertaken as part of a larger restraint use survey. The survey was conducted at 61 sites in metropolitan Adelaide and rural regions within South Australia on weekdays and a weekend in 2009.

RESULTS

A total of 64 (0.6%) of the 11,524 drivers observed during the survey were using handheld phones. Handheld phone usage rates ranged from 0.8 percent in metropolitan Adelaide to 0.3 percent in the rural region of The Riverland. Of all driver, site, and vehicle characteristics examined, the only statistically significant difference in handheld phone usage was for the number of vehicle occupants. The odds of a driver using a handheld phone while traveling alone was over 4 times higher than for a driver traveling with passengers.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of handheld phone use among drivers in South Australia appears to be low relative to other jurisdictions. The level of enforcement activity and severity of penalties do not offer a clear explanation for the higher levels of compliance with phone laws. Given the rate of increase in phone technology, it is important to conduct regular roadside surveys of phone use among drivers to monitor trends in usage over time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在量化南澳大利亚州驾驶员在驾驶时使用手持电话的程度。该研究还旨在调查与手持电话使用相关的任何驾驶员、地点和车辆特征,以为对策制定和宣传活动提供信息。

方法

作为约束使用调查的一部分,对手持电话的使用进行了道路观察调查。该调查于 2009 年在阿德莱德大都市区和南澳大利亚农村地区的 61 个地点以及周末进行。

结果

在调查期间观察到的 11524 名驾驶员中,共有 64 名(0.6%)正在使用手持电话。手持电话使用比例从阿德莱德大都市区的 0.8%到里弗兰地区的 0.3%不等。在所检查的所有驾驶员、地点和车辆特征中,唯一在手持电话使用方面具有统计学意义的差异是车辆乘客数量。与有乘客同行的驾驶员相比,独自驾驶的驾驶员使用手持电话的可能性要高出 4 倍以上。

结论

与其他司法管辖区相比,南澳大利亚州驾驶员使用手持电话的程度似乎较低。执法活动的水平和处罚的严厉程度并不能清楚地解释对电话法规的更高遵守程度。鉴于电话技术的增长率,定期对驾驶员的电话使用情况进行道路抽查以监测随时间推移的使用趋势非常重要。

相似文献

1
Phone use while driving: results from an observational survey.驾车时使用手机:来自观察性调查的结果。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(6):537-41. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.843075.
2
Look who's talking! A roadside survey of drivers' cell phone use.看看是谁在说话!一项关于司机使用手机的路边调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Dec;11(6):555-60. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2010.499442.
3
Long-term effects of handheld cell phone laws on driver handheld cell phone use.手持手机法规对驾驶员使用手持手机行为的长期影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;11(2):133-41. doi: 10.1080/15389580903515427.
4
Driver hand-held cellular phone use: a four-year analysis.驾驶员手持移动电话使用情况:四年分析
J Safety Res. 2006;37(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
5
The impact of legislation in Ireland on handheld mobile phone use by drivers.爱尔兰立法对司机使用手持移动电话的影响。
Ir Med J. 2008 Jul-Aug;101(7):221-2.
6
A roadside study of observable driver distractions.一项关于可观察到的驾驶员分心情况的路边研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(6):552-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.989319. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
7
A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.驾驶员在手机通话中分心时的反应时间的参数持续时间模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
Cell phone users, reported crash risk, unsafe driving behaviors and dispositions: a survey of motorists in Maryland.手机用户、报告的撞车风险、不安全驾驶行为及性格特征:对马里兰州驾车者的一项调查
J Safety Res. 2007;38(6):683-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
9
Distracted driving behaviors of adults while children are in the car.成年人在车内照看儿童时的分心驾驶行为。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4 Suppl 3):S290-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182924200.
10
Effect of North Carolina's restriction on teenage driver cell phone use two years after implementation.北卡罗来纳州限制青少年司机使用手机两年后的效果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep;48:363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving simulator study of text messaging and phone conversations: Effects of messages' valence, drivers' values and self-reported driving behaviors.短信与电话交谈的驾驶模拟器研究:信息效价、驾驶员价值观及自我报告的驾驶行为的影响
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 21;11(2):e42128. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42128. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: Prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies.昆士兰地区驾车时使用手机的风险因素:流行程度、态度、撞车风险认知及任务管理策略。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183361. eCollection 2017.
3
Seat belt and mobile phone use among vehicle drivers in the city of Doha, Qatar: an observational study.
卡塔尔多哈市车辆驾驶员使用安全带和手机情况的观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 22;15:937. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2283-3.