Gülpınar Omer, Haliloğlu Ahmet Hakan, Gökce Mehmet İlker, Arıkan Nihat
Department of Urology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Korean J Urol. 2014 May;55(5):354-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.5.354. Epub 2014 May 12.
In the treatment of interstitial cystitis, intravesical hyaluronic acid application may be suggested as a treatment option. In this randomized prospective study, the authors aimed to identify whether instilling the hyaluronic acid with electromotive drug administration (EMDA) would increase the tissue uptake and improve the efficacy.
The data of 31 patients who had been diagnosed with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) between 2004 and 2005 were examined. The patients were randomized to two groups: patients in group A received hyaluronic acid directly with a catheter and patients in group B received hyaluronic acid with EMDA. The patients were followed for 24 months and the two groups were compared at certain time intervals. The primary end points of the study were visual analogue scale (VAS) score, global response assessment, and micturition frequency in 24 hours.
There were 6 males and 25 females. The two groups were similar in baseline parameters. The decrease in VAS score and the micturition frequency in 24 hours were significantly lower with EMDA at months 6 and 12. The difference between the two groups was not significant at months 1 and 24. Also, treatment with EMDA, positive KCl test, and pretreatment voiding frequency >17 were associated with higher response rates.
Hyaluronic acid installation is an effective glycosaminoglycan substitution therapy in patients with BPS/IC. Instillation of hyaluronic acid via EMDA can improve the efficacy of the treatment; however, lack of long-term efficacy is the major problem with this glycosaminoglycan substitution therapy.
在间质性膀胱炎的治疗中,膀胱内应用透明质酸可作为一种治疗选择。在这项随机前瞻性研究中,作者旨在确定通过电动药物导入(EMDA)注入透明质酸是否会增加组织摄取并提高疗效。
研究了2004年至2005年间被诊断为膀胱疼痛综合征/间质性膀胱炎(BPS/IC)的31例患者的数据。患者被随机分为两组:A组患者通过导管直接接受透明质酸,B组患者通过EMDA接受透明质酸。对患者进行24个月的随访,并在特定时间间隔对两组进行比较。该研究的主要终点是视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、整体反应评估以及24小时排尿频率。
有6名男性和25名女性。两组的基线参数相似。在第6个月和第12个月时,EMDA组的VAS评分降低以及24小时排尿频率降低更为显著。在第1个月和第24个月时,两组之间的差异不显著。此外,EMDA治疗、氯化钾试验阳性以及治疗前排尿频率>17与更高的反应率相关。
透明质酸灌注是BPS/IC患者有效的糖胺聚糖替代疗法。通过EMDA灌注透明质酸可提高治疗效果;然而,缺乏长期疗效是这种糖胺聚糖替代疗法的主要问题。