On the evidence for a 'pure' binocular process in human vision.

Wolfe (1986, Psychol. Rev. 93, 269-282) proposed a model of human binocular vision based on the assumption of two functionally distinct classes of binocular neuron. These neurons may be regarded as logical AND and OR gates. In the present paper we assess the evidence relevant to this assumption. We find that while both types of binocular neuron have been described in the cortex of cat and monkey, there is no indication that they form functionally separate populations. Critical analysis of the psychophysical evidence for AND and OR channels in human vision suggests that much of the data presented in favor of an AND channel is subject to alternative interpretations. We conclude that the available data are not consistent with the existence of separate channels as proposed by Wolfe.