Suppr超能文献

关于印度博物馆和印度海洋调查局在1890年至1891年间发表的与詹姆斯·伍德 - 梅森和阿尔弗雷德·威廉·阿尔科克相关的两份报告:对软甲纲命名法的影响

On two reports associated with James Wood-Mason and Alfred William Alcock published by the Indian Museum and the Indian Marine Survey between 1890 and 1891: implications for malacostracan nomenclature.

作者信息

Huys Rony, Low Martyn E Y, De Grave Sammy, Ng Peter K L, Clark Paul F

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.; Email:

Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Block S6, Science Drive 2, #03-01, Singapore 117546, Republic of Singapore.; Email:

出版信息

Zootaxa. 2014 Jan 29;3757:1-78. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3757.1.1.

Abstract

Two rare documents associated with the Indian Museum and the Indian Marine Survey for the administrative year April 1890 to March 1891 have been examined and found to have nomenclatural consequences for malacostracan crustaceans. Even though they constitute available published works according to the International Code for Zoological Nomenclature, these reports have rarely been cited. Dating these two publications is of importance as they make decapod scientific names available and, in a few instances, describe the same taxa. After searching the collections deposited in the Asian and African Room, British Library, the Administration Report of the Indian Marine for the year April 1890 to March 1891 could be dated with some degree of certainty as 25 August 1891. In contrast, dating the Indian Museum Annual Report proved more difficult because after examination of copies held by the General Library in the Natural History Museum, London, it was evident that not all of these reports were consistently published on time to meet an end of year deadline. However, the publication of volume XXII of the Indian Museum Annual Report for the year April 1890 to March 1891 appeared to be contemporary with the year printed at the bottom of the title page. As no exact date could be established with confidence, the publication date for this volume was fixed as 31 December 1891 in accordance with ICZN Art. 21.3.2. Therefore the Administration Report of the Indian Marine (published 25 August 1891) is considered to take precedence over the Indian Museum Annual Report (published 31 December 1891) and as such the names made available in the former take priority. As original copies of the Administration Report of the Indian Marine are not readily available in most libraries and few scientists have actually had access to these publications, the relevant Appendix No. XIII, in which the names of several malacostracan taxa are made available, is reproduced here. Since the appendix is not conclusively attributable to a specific author, it is considered to be written anonymously and should therefore be cited as Anonymous (1891). A number of names in Appendix No. XIII are available since they are accompanied by a brief description of the taxa they denote, and are either attributable to James Wood-Mason or remain with anonymous authorship; others are nomina nuda without a diagnosis or indication, or have been diagnosed previously in the "Natural History Notes from H.M. Indian Marine Survey Steamer Investigator". The nomenclatural implications for eight names made available in Anonymous (1891) are discussed: Glyphocrangon caeca, Glyphocrangon sculptus var. coecescens, Psalidopodidae, Psalidopus, Psalidopus mirabilis, Psathyrocaris, Psathyrocaris fragilis and Psopheticus crepitans. The nomenclatural history of various other taxa, initially denoted by unavailable names in Anonymous (1891), is also documented. The authorships of the various crustacean taxa collected by the Indian Marine Survey Steamer Investigator during the seasons 1889-1890 and 1890-1891, and published in two series of connected parts in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History, are also re-assessed and summarised. A rare document containing the list of R.I.M.S. Investigator stations for the period 1884-1913 is reproduced for the future benefit of the scientific community.

摘要

已查阅了两份与印度博物馆和印度海洋调查相关的、涉及1890年4月至1891年3月行政年度的稀有文件,发现它们对软甲纲甲壳动物具有命名学意义。尽管根据《国际动物命名法规》,这些报告属于已发表的可用文献,但很少被引用。确定这两份出版物的日期很重要,因为它们提供了十足目动物的学名,并且在某些情况下描述了相同的分类单元。在查阅了大英图书馆亚洲和非洲阅览室收藏的文献后,1890年4月至1891年3月的《印度海洋管理报告》可以较为确定地定为1891年8月25日。相比之下,确定《印度博物馆年度报告》的日期则更为困难,因为在查阅了伦敦自然历史博物馆总图书馆所藏的副本后,很明显并非所有这些报告都能按时一致出版以赶上年底的截止日期。然而,1890年4月至1891年3月的《印度博物馆年度报告》第二十二卷的出版时间似乎与标题页底部印的年份是同时期的。由于无法确切确定具体日期,根据《国际动物命名法规》第21.3.2条,该卷的出版日期定为1891年12月31日。因此,《印度海洋管理报告》(1891年8月25日出版)被认为优先于《印度博物馆年度报告》(1891年12月31日出版),因此前者中提供的名称具有优先权。由于大多数图书馆都不容易找到《印度海洋管理报告》的原件,而且很少有科学家实际查阅过这些出版物,因此在此转载了相关的第十三号附录,其中列出了几种软甲纲分类单元的名称。由于该附录无法确凿地归属于特定作者,因此被视为匿名撰写,因此应引用为匿名(1891年)。第十三号附录中的一些名称是可用的,因为它们附有对所指分类单元的简要描述,并且要么归属于詹姆斯·伍德 - 梅森,要么仍为匿名作者;其他一些则是没有诊断或说明的裸名,或者之前已在《H.M.印度海洋调查汽船“调查者”号的自然历史笔记》中被诊断过。讨论了匿名(1891年)中提供的八个名称的命名学含义:盲刻虾、雕刻刻虾变种盲刻虾、伪足虾科、伪足虾属、奇异伪足虾、拟糙虾属、脆弱拟糙虾和脆响虾属。还记录了最初在匿名(1891年)中以不可用名称表示的其他各种分类单元的命名学史。对印度海洋调查汽船“调查者”号在1889 - 189和1890 - 1891季节收集的、发表在《自然历史年鉴与杂志》两系列相关部分中的各种甲壳纲分类单元的作者归属也进行了重新评估和总结。一份包含1884 - 1913年R.I.M.S. “调查者”号站点列表的稀有文件被转载,以供科学界未来参考。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验