Yap E, Parashos P, Borromeo G L
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Int Endod J. 2015 Apr;48(4):351-61. doi: 10.1111/iej.12321. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
To identify current trends of root canal treatment for patients with special needs.
A postal questionnaire was sent to General Dentists in Victoria, Australia and Endodontists and Special Needs Dentists across Australia to determine the extent of root canal treatment performed on special needs patients.
Over a four-month period, 1120 questionnaires were distributed with an overall response rate of 63.9% (n = 716). Response rates were 63.2% (n = 655), 68.5% (n = 50) and 100.0% (n = 11) amongst General Dentists, Endodontists and Special Needs Dentists, respectively. Endodontists (95.7%) and Special Needs Dentists (100.0%) performed significantly more root canal treatment on adult patients with special needs compared with 51.2% of General Dentists, (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001 respectively; Fisher's exact test). The most common reasons for not undertaking root canal treatment included limited cooperation, poor oral hygiene and uncontrolled movement. Amongst General Dentists, 75.7% opted for extraction in preference to root canal treatment. Significantly, more specialist practitioners performed root canal treatment utilizing conscious sedation (P < 0.001) and general anaesthesia (P = 0.003). Most specialist practitioners (69.1%) had undertaken single-visit root canal treatment on special needs patients compared with only 29.7% of General Dentists (P < 0.001).
Root canal treatment in special needs patients was more likely to be carried out by specialist dental practitioners who were more likely to utilize a pharmacological approach for behaviour guidance and to perform single-visit root canal treatment compared with General Dentists. A multidisciplinary approach for special needs patients who require root canal treatment provides an opportunity for these patients to retain their dentition.
确定特殊需求患者根管治疗的当前趋势。
向澳大利亚维多利亚州的普通牙医以及澳大利亚各地的牙髓病医生和特殊需求牙医发送了邮政调查问卷,以确定对特殊需求患者进行根管治疗的程度。
在四个月的时间里,共发放了1120份问卷,总体回复率为63.9%(n = 716)。普通牙医、牙髓病医生和特殊需求牙医的回复率分别为63.2%(n = 655)、68.5%(n = 50)和100.0%(n = 11)。与51.2%的普通牙医相比,牙髓病医生(95.7%)和特殊需求牙医(100.0%)对有特殊需求的成年患者进行的根管治疗明显更多(分别为P < 0.001和P = 0.001;Fisher精确检验)。不进行根管治疗的最常见原因包括合作受限、口腔卫生差和无法控制的运动。在普通牙医中,75.7%的人选择拔牙而不是根管治疗。值得注意的是,更多的专科医生在根管治疗中使用了清醒镇静(P < 0.001)和全身麻醉(P = 0.003)。大多数专科医生(69.1%)对特殊需求患者进行了一次性根管治疗,而普通牙医中只有29.7%(P < 0.001)。
与普通牙医相比,专科牙科医生更有可能对特殊需求患者进行根管治疗,他们更有可能采用药物方法进行行为引导,并进行一次性根管治疗。对于需要根管治疗的特殊需求患者,多学科方法为这些患者保留牙列提供了机会。