• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在适应新的运动动态时,基于视觉的手动瞄准运动在线控制是否会受到干扰?

Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics?

作者信息

Mackrous Isabelle, Proteau Luc

机构信息

Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, Canada.

Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2014.05.007
PMID:24874948
Abstract

Previous research has shown that for goal-directed movements, online visual feedback is not necessary for the adaptation of movement planning to novel movement dynamics. In the present study, we wanted to put this proposition to a stringent test and determine whether the usually dominant role of online visual feedback in movement control is diminished when goal-directed movements are performed in a condition that modifies limb dynamics. Participants performed a video-aiming task while the center of mass of their forearm was experimentally displaced by a 1.5-kg mass attached laterally to its longitudinal axis. A cursor representing the position of the participant's hand was either visible or not visible during the acquisition phase. Then, in a transfer test, the participants performed the task without online visual feedback and either with or without the lateral mass. During the acquisition phase, the participants adapted to the new movement dynamics imposed by the added mass regardless of whether online visual feedback was available. An important new finding of the present study was the observation that the role usually played by online visual feedback in refining movement planning and ensuring control of the initial portion of goal-directed movements was suppressed during adaptation to novel movement dynamics. This resulted in an increase in the role played by visual feedback late in the movement to ensure endpoint accuracy.

摘要

先前的研究表明,对于目标导向运动而言,在线视觉反馈对于运动规划适应新的运动动力学并非必要。在本研究中,我们想对这一观点进行严格测试,并确定当在改变肢体动力学的条件下进行目标导向运动时,在线视觉反馈在运动控制中通常占主导地位的作用是否会减弱。参与者执行一项视频瞄准任务,同时通过横向附着在其纵轴上的1.5千克重物,实验性地使他们前臂的质心发生位移。在采集阶段,代表参与者手部位置的光标要么可见,要么不可见。然后,在转移测试中,参与者在没有在线视觉反馈的情况下执行任务,且要么有要么没有横向重物。在采集阶段,无论是否有在线视觉反馈,参与者都适应了由附加重物施加的新运动动力学。本研究的一个重要新发现是,观察到在适应新的运动动力学过程中,在线视觉反馈在优化运动规划和确保目标导向运动初始部分控制方面通常所起的作用受到了抑制。这导致运动后期视觉反馈在确保终点准确性方面所起的作用增加。

相似文献

1
Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics?在适应新的运动动态时,基于视觉的手动瞄准运动在线控制是否会受到干扰?
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 27.
2
When adaptive control fails: Slow recovery of reduced rapid online control during reaching under reversed vision.当适应性控制失效时:在反向视觉下伸手过程中,降低的快速在线控制恢复缓慢。
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
Visual monitoring of goal-directed aiming movements.目标导向瞄准动作的视觉监测。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):736-749. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1156716. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Impact of online visual feedback on motor acquisition and retention when learning to reach in a force field.在线视觉反馈对在力场中学习伸手动作时运动技能习得与保持的影响。
Neuroscience. 2016 Nov 19;337:267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
5
Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.视动图不确定性对视动适应的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;107(6):1576-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.00204.2011. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
6
Automaticity of online control processes in manual aiming.手动瞄准中在线控制过程的自动性。
J Vis. 2010 Dec 29;10(14):27. doi: 10.1167/10.14.27.
7
Eye movements in interception with delayed visual feedback.延迟视觉反馈下拦截动作中的眼球运动。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1837-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5257-8. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
The dual role of vision in sequential aiming movements.视觉在连续瞄准动作中的双重作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):425-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
9
Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies.实践的特异性源于运动规划策略的差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Nov;183(2):181-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1031-z. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
10
Evidence for continuous processing of visual information in a manual video-aiming task.手动视频瞄准任务中视觉信息持续处理的证据。
J Mot Behav. 2009 May;41(3):219-31. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.3.219-231.

引用本文的文献

1
The specificity of practice hypothesis in goal-directed movements: visual dominance or proprioception neglect?目标导向运动中练习假设的特异性:视觉主导还是本体感觉忽视?
Psychol Res. 2017 Mar;81(2):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0748-3. Epub 2016 Feb 12.