Castillo-Lopez E, Wiese B I, Hendrick S, McKinnon J J, McAllister T A, Beauchemin K A, Penner G B
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5A8.
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5A8 Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5A8.
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):3053-63. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7599. Epub 2014 May 30.
The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, prevalence, severity, and risk factors for ruminal acidosis in feedlot steers during backgrounding, diet transition, and finishing. Steers were purchased from a local auction market (n = 250; mean ± SD; 330 ± 20.0 kg initial BW) and were grouped together with 28 steers fitted with a ruminal cannula (248 ± 25.5 kg initial BW). Steers were randomly allocated to 1 of 8 pens (3 to 4 cannulated steers per pen with a total of 35 steers/pen). The feeding period (143 d) was divided into 4 phases: backgrounding (BKGD; d 1 to 20), diet transition (TRAN; d 21 to 40), and the first (FIN1; d 41 to 91) and second half (FIN2; d 92 to 143) of finishing. The BKGD diet contained (% DM) barley silage (45.7%), barley grain (41.6%), canola meal (4.2%), and a pelleted mineral and vitamin supplement (8.5%). Steers were transitioned to a finishing diet containing (% DM) barley silage (5%), barley grain (80.9%), canola meal (4.9%), and a pelleted mineral and vitamin supplement (9.2%) using 4 transition diets. Feed was offered to achieve 5% refusals (as-is basis). Ruminal pH was recorded in cannulated steers every 10 min throughout the study, and feed refusals and BW were recorded at 2 wk intervals. Mean ruminal pH (P < 0.01) was 6.4, 6.3, 6.2, and 6.0 ± 0.01 during the BKGD, TRAN, FIN1, and FIN2, respectively. The duration (P < 0.01) pH < 5.5 was 4.1, 12.1, 78.7, and 194 ± 9.4 min/d during BKGD, TRAN, FIN1, and FIN2, respectively. Using a threshold of ruminal pH < 5.5 for at least 180 min to diagnose ruminal acidosis, incidence was defined as the number of times steers experienced ruminal acidosis during each period and prevalence was defined as the percentage of steers that experienced acidosis during each period. On average, the incidence rate (P < 0.01) of ruminal acidosis was 0.1, 0.3, 6.7, and 14.8 ± 0.97 episodes during BKGD, TRAN, FIN1, and FIN2, respectively. In the same order, the prevalence (P < 0.01) was 0.7, 1.7, 15.4, and 37.8 ± 2.0%. Based on multiple regression, factors associated with prevalence of ruminal acidosis and the duration pH < 5.5 were feeding phase (P < 0.01) and DMI (P < 0.01). Overall, the greatest incidence, prevalence, and severity of ruminal acidosis were observed towards the end of the finishing phase and were associated with days on feed and DMI.
本研究的目的是确定育肥牛在育肥前期、日粮转换期和育肥后期瘤胃酸中毒的发病率、患病率、严重程度及风险因素。从当地拍卖市场购买了育肥牛(n = 250;平均±标准差;初始体重330±20.0 kg),并将其与28头安装了瘤胃瘘管的育肥牛(初始体重248±25.5 kg)归为一组。将育肥牛随机分配到8个栏舍中的1个(每个栏舍有3至4头安装瘘管的育肥牛,每个栏舍共35头育肥牛)。饲养期(143天)分为4个阶段:育肥前期(BKGD;第1至20天)、日粮转换期(TRAN;第21至40天)以及育肥后期的前半段(FIN1;第41至91天)和后半段(FIN2;第92至143天)。育肥前期日粮包含(干物质基础)大麦青贮(45.7%)、大麦粒(41.6%)、油菜籽粕(4.2%)以及颗粒状矿物质和维生素补充剂(8.5%)。使用4种过渡日粮将育肥牛转换至育肥后期日粮,该日粮包含(干物质基础)大麦青贮(5%)、大麦粒(80.9%)、油菜籽粕(4.9%)以及颗粒状矿物质和维生素补充剂(9.2%)。提供饲料以达到5%的剩料量(按原样计算)。在整个研究过程中,每隔10分钟记录安装瘘管育肥牛的瘤胃pH值,每隔2周记录剩料量和体重。在育肥前期、日粮转换期、育肥后期前半段和育肥后期后半段,瘤胃平均pH值(P < 0.01)分别为6.4、6.3、6.2和6.0±0.01。在育肥前期、日粮转换期、育肥后期前半段和育肥后期后半段,pH值< 5.5的持续时间(P < 0.01)分别为4.1、12.1、78.7和194±9.4分钟/天。以瘤胃pH值< 5.5至少持续180分钟作为诊断瘤胃酸中毒的阈值,发病率定义为育肥牛在每个阶段发生瘤胃酸中毒的次数,患病率定义为每个阶段发生酸中毒的育肥牛的百分比。平均而言,瘤胃酸中毒的发病率(P < 0.01)在育肥前期、日粮转换期、育肥后期前半段和育肥后期后半段分别为0.1、0.3、6.7和14.8±0.97次发作。按相同顺序,患病率(P < 0.01)分别为0.7%、1.7%、15.4%和37.8±2.0%。基于多元回归分析,与瘤胃酸中毒患病率及pH值< 5.5的持续时间相关的因素为饲养阶段(P < 0.01)和干物质采食量(P < 0.01)。总体而言,在育肥后期末观察到瘤胃酸中毒的发病率、患病率和严重程度最高,且与饲养天数和干物质采食量有关。