Greco R, D'Alterio D, Schiattarella M, Musto B, Wolff S, Boccia A S, Mininni N
Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Monaldi, Naples, Italy.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Jan;2(6):791-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00133209.
A randomized, single-blind controlled study intended to assess the potential benefits of intravenous amiodarone in anterior myocardial infarction is presented. Three hundred nineteen patients entered the study, 159 received amiodarone infusion, and 160 received glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion. Basal characteristics were similar in the two experimental groups, who were randomized on a consecutive basis. Exclusion criteria were shock or pulmonary edema, hypotension, inferoposterior infarction, bradycardia, antrioventricular block, severe diabetes, and other major diseases. Patients aged 27 to 70 years, with a Q-wave anterior infarction, initiated 12-40 hours earlier at the time of admission, entered the trial. Other entry criteria were heart rate higher than 80 beats/min and systolic blood pressure higher than 100 mmHg. Amiodarone was administered in saline infusion 10-20 mg/kg, within 4 to 10 hours, through a central vein. GIK infusion consisted of 150-300 g of glucose, 25-50 IU of insulin, and 80-120 mEq of KCl in 1000 cc of water at a rate of 1.5-2.0 ml/g/hour. Both groups received digitalis, nitrates, sedatives, and diuretics as needed. Although individually the major endpoints of death, reinfarction, and sustained supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias did not differ significantly, each was less in the amiodarone group than in the control, and the sum of all adverse events was significantly lower for the amiodarone patients (p less than 001). Heart failure and conduction disturbances were not different in the two groups. This study shows that amiodarone, with its vasodilating and antiarrhythmic properties, may be beneficial in acute anterior infarction, but further studies on larger populations will be necessary in order to show a reduction of mortality rate.
本文介绍了一项旨在评估静脉注射胺碘酮在前壁心肌梗死中的潜在益处的随机、单盲对照研究。319名患者进入该研究,159名接受胺碘酮输注,160名接受葡萄糖 - 胰岛素 - 钾(GIK)输注。两个实验组的基础特征相似,他们是连续随机分组的。排除标准为休克或肺水肿、低血压、下后壁梗死、心动过缓、房室传导阻滞、严重糖尿病和其他重大疾病。年龄在27至70岁之间,入院时发病12 - 40小时前出现Q波前壁梗死的患者进入试验。其他入选标准为心率高于80次/分钟和收缩压高于100 mmHg。胺碘酮以10 - 20 mg/kg的剂量在4至10小时内通过中心静脉在生理盐水输注中给药。GIK输注由150 - 300 g葡萄糖、25 - 50 IU胰岛素和80 - 120 mEq氯化钾溶于1000 cc水中组成,输注速度为1.5 - 2.0 ml/g/小时。两组均根据需要接受洋地黄、硝酸盐、镇静剂和利尿剂治疗。虽然单独来看,死亡、再梗死以及持续性室上性和室性心律失常等主要终点在两组之间没有显著差异,但胺碘酮组的各项指标均低于对照组,且胺碘酮治疗患者的所有不良事件总和显著更低(p小于0.001)。两组的心力衰竭和传导障碍情况没有差异。这项研究表明,具有血管舒张和抗心律失常特性的胺碘酮可能对急性前壁梗死有益,但为了证明其能降低死亡率,还需要对更多人群进行进一步研究。