Pearlman Daniel M, Najjar Souhel
Neuroinflammation Research Group, Epilepsy Center Division, Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Audrey and Theodor Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Neuroinflammation Research Group, Epilepsy Center Division, Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies have been documented in the serum of individuals with primary psychiatric disorders from several independent cohorts, but these findings have not been systematically assessed in aggregate or in relation to methodological covariates.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for studies in any language that provided data on NMDAR antibody seropositivity or absolute serum titers in schizophrenia or schizoaffective, bipolar, or major depressive disorders. We used a random effects model to pool estimates across studies.
Nine studies met the eligibility criteria. Five studies (3387 participants) provided data on NMDAR antibody seropositivity in psychiatric versus control groups based on high-specificity seropositivity thresholds (cell-based assays [CBAs]: 1:320 dilution, 1:200 dilution, visual score>1; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]: 90(th) percentile of control titers). Meta-analysis showed significantly higher odds of NMDAR antibody seropositivity among those with schizophrenia or schizoaffective, bipolar, or major depressive disorders compared with healthy controls (odds ratio [OR], 3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-9.27; P=.043; I(2)=68%). Four studies (3194 participants) provided outcome data for these groups based on low-specificity seropositivity thresholds (CBAs 1:10 dilution; ELISA: 75(th) percentile of control titers). Meta-analysis showed greater heterogeneity and no significant between-group difference (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.55-9.73; P=.25; I(2)=90%). Seropositive participants in psychiatric groups had various combinations of IgG, IgM, and IgA class antibodies against NR1, NR1/NR2B, and NR2A/NR2B subunits. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher odds of seropositivity among all participants based on 1:10 versus 1:320 dilution seropositivity thresholds (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.41-8.62; P<.001; I(2)=0%; studies=2, n=2920), but no apparent difference between first-episode and chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.19-7.24; P=.88, I(2)=43%, studies=2, n=1108). Average NR2A/NR2B antibody titers determined by ELISA were significantly higher among participants with first-episode schizophrenia (P<.0001) and acute mania (P<.01) compared with healthy controls. Levels decreased by 58% at 8weeks in first-episode schizophrenia, and by about 13% at 4days in acute mania.
Individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective, bipolar, or major depressive disorders are collectively about three times more likely to have elevated NMDAR antibody titers compared with healthy controls based on high-specificity, but not low-specificity, seropositivity thresholds, though considerable methodological and statistical heterogeneity exists. Evidence concerning the effect of disease state and time of serum acquisition is varied and consistent, respectively. Adequately powered longitudinal studies employing standardized assay methods and seropositivity threshold definitions, and quantifying NMDAR antibodies in both sera and cerebrospinal fluid are needed to further elucidate the clinical and pathophysiological implications of this association.
在来自多个独立队列的原发性精神障碍患者血清中已检测到N - 甲基 - D - 天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)抗体,但这些发现尚未进行系统的汇总评估,也未与方法学协变量相关联进行评估。
我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和PsycINFO数据库,查找以任何语言发表的、提供有关精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍、双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症患者中NMDAR抗体血清阳性或绝对血清滴度数据的研究。我们使用随机效应模型对各研究的估计值进行汇总。
9项研究符合纳入标准。5项研究(3387名参与者)基于高特异性血清阳性阈值(基于细胞的检测法[CBA]:1:320稀释度、1:200稀释度、视觉评分>1;酶联免疫吸附测定[ELISA]:对照滴度的第90百分位数)提供了精神疾病组与对照组中NMDAR抗体血清阳性的数据。荟萃分析显示,与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍、双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症患者中NMDAR抗体血清阳性的几率显著更高(优势比[OR],3.10;95%置信区间[CI],1.04 - 9.27;P = 0.043;I² = 68%)。4项研究(3194名参与者)基于低特异性血清阳性阈值(CBA 1:10稀释度;ELISA:对照滴度的第75百分位数)提供了这些组的结果数据。荟萃分析显示异质性更大,组间无显著差异(OR,2.31;95% CI,0.55 - 9.73;P = 0.25;I² = 90%)。精神疾病组中的血清阳性参与者具有针对NR1、NR1/NR2B和NR2A/NR2B亚基的IgG、IgM和IgA类抗体的各种组合。亚组分析显示,基于1:10与1:320稀释度血清阳性阈值,所有参与者中血清阳性的几率显著更高(OR,4.56;95% CI,2.41 - 8.62;P < 0.001;I² = 0%;研究 = 2,n = 2920),但首发精神分裂症与慢性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍之间无明显差异(OR,1.15;95% CI,0.19 - 7.24;P = 0.88,I² = 43%,研究 = 2,n = 1108)。通过ELISA测定,首发精神分裂症患者(P < 0.0001)和急性躁狂症患者(P < 0.01)的平均NR2A/NR2B抗体滴度显著高于健康对照组。首发精神分裂症患者在8周时水平下降58%,急性躁狂症患者在4天时水平下降约13%。
基于高特异性而非低特异性血清阳性阈值,与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍、双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症患者总体上NMDAR抗体滴度升高的可能性约为三倍,尽管存在相当大的方法学和统计学异质性。关于疾病状态和血清采集时间影响的证据分别是多样的和一致的。需要开展有足够效力的纵向研究,采用标准化检测方法和血清阳性阈值定义,并对血清和脑脊液中的NMDAR抗体进行定量,以进一步阐明这种关联的临床和病理生理学意义。