Cadeddu Christian, Nocco Silvio, Cugusi Lucia, Deidda Martino, Bina Alessandro, Fabio Orru, Bandinu Stefano, Cossu Efisio, Baroni Marco Giorgio, Mercuro Giuseppe
Department of Medical Sciences "M, Aresu", University Hospital of Cagliari, SS 554, Km 4,500, 09042 Monserrato, Italy.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 May 15;13:93. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-93.
Metformin (MET) therapy exerts positive effects improving glucose tolerance and preventing the evolution toward diabetes in insulin resistant patients. It has been shown that adding MET to exercise training does not improve insulin sensitivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of MET and exercise training alone or in combination on maximal aerobic capacity and, as a secondary end-point on quality of life indexes in individuals with insulin resistance.
75 insulin resistant patients were enrolled and subsequently assigned to MET (M), MET with exercise training (MEx), and exercise training alone (Ex). 12-weeks of supervised exercise-training program was carried out in both Ex and MEx groups. Cardiopulmonary exercise test and SF-36 to evaluate Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was performed at basal and after 12-weeks of treatment.
Cardiopulmonary exercise test showed a significant increase of peak VO2 in Ex and MEx whereas M showed no improvement of peak VO2 (∆ VO2 [CI 95%] Ex +0.26 [0.47 to 0.05] l/min; ∆ VO2 MEx +0.19 [0.33 to 0.05] l/min; ∆ VO2 M -0.09 [-0.03 to -0.15] l/min; M vs E p < 0.01; M vs MEx p < 0.01; MEx vs Ex p = ns). SF-36 highlighted a significant increase in general QoL index in the MEx (58.3 ± 19 vs 77.3 ± 16; p < 0.01) and Ex (62.1 ± 17 vs 73.7 ± 12; p < 0.005) groups.
We evidenced that cardiopulmonary negative effects showed by MET therapy may be counterbalanced with the combination of exercise training. Given that exercise training associated with MET produced similar effects to exercise training alone in terms of maximal aerobic capacity and HRQoL, programmed exercise training remains the first choice therapy in insulin resistant patients.
二甲双胍(MET)治疗对改善胰岛素抵抗患者的糖耐量及预防糖尿病进展具有积极作用。研究表明,在运动训练中添加MET并不能提高胰岛素敏感性。本研究旨在确定MET和运动训练单独或联合应用对胰岛素抵抗个体最大有氧能力的影响,并将生活质量指标作为次要终点进行研究。
纳入75例胰岛素抵抗患者,随后将其分为MET组(M)、MET联合运动训练组(MEx)和单纯运动训练组(Ex)。Ex组和MEx组均进行为期12周的有监督运动训练计划。在治疗前及治疗12周后进行心肺运动试验及SF-36量表评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
心肺运动试验显示,Ex组和MEx组的峰值VO₂显著增加,而M组的峰值VO₂无改善(∆VO₂[CI 95%]Ex组+0.26[0.47至0.05]l/min;∆VO₂MEx组+0.19[0.33至0.05]l/min;∆VO₂M组-0.09[-0.03至-0.15]l/min;M组与Ex组比较p<0.01;M组与MEx组比较p<0.01;MEx组与Ex组比较p=无显著性差异)。SF-36量表显示,MEx组(58.3±19 vs 77.3±16;p<0.01)和Ex组(62.1±17 vs 73.7±12;p<0.005)的总体生活质量指数显著提高。
我们证明,MET治疗所显示的心肺负面影响可通过运动训练的联合应用得到抵消。鉴于与MET联合的运动训练在最大有氧能力和HRQoL方面产生的效果与单纯运动训练相似,有计划的运动训练仍然是胰岛素抵抗患者的首选治疗方法。