Cahill Naomi E, Murch Lauren, Wang Miao, Day Andrew G, Cook Deborah, Heyland Daren K
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, 99 University Ave, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 1;14:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-197.
A growing body of literature supports the need to identify and address barriers to knowledge use as a strategy to improve care delivery. To this end, we developed a questionnaire to assess barriers to enterally feeding critically ill adult patients, and sought to gain evidence to support the construct validity of this instrument by testing the hypothesis that barriers identified by the questionnaire are inversely associated with nutrition performance.
We conducted a multilevel multivariable regression analysis of data from an observational study in 55 Intensive Care Units (ICUs) from 5 geographic regions. Data on nutrition practices were abstracted from 1153 patient charts, and 1439 critical care nurses completed the 'Barriers to Enterally Feeding critically Ill Patients' questionnaire. Our primary outcome was adequacy of calories from enteral nutrition (proportion of prescribed calories received enterally) and our primary predictor of interest was a barrier score derived from ratings of importance of items in the questionnaire.
The mean adequacy of calories from enteral nutrition was 48 (Standard Deviation (SD)17)%. Evaluation for confounding identified patient type, proportion of nurse respondents working in the ICU greater than 5 years, and geographic region as important covariates. In a regression model adjusting for these covariates plus evaluable nutrition days and APACHE II score, we observed that a 10 point increase in overall barrier score is associated with a 3.5 (Standard Error (SE)1.3)% decrease in enteral nutrition adequacy (p-values <0.01).
Our results provide evidence to support our a priori hypothesis that barriers negatively impact the provision of nutrition in ICUs, suggesting that our recently developed questionnaire may be a promising tool to identify these important factors, and guide the selection of interventions to optimize nutrition practice. Further research is required to illuminate if and how the type of barrier, profession of the provider, and geographic location of the hospital may influence this association.
越来越多的文献支持有必要识别并解决知识应用的障碍,以此作为改善医疗服务的一项策略。为此,我们编制了一份问卷,以评估成年重症患者肠内营养的障碍,并试图通过检验问卷所识别的障碍与营养状况呈负相关这一假设,来获取支持该工具结构效度的证据。
我们对来自5个地理区域的55个重症监护病房(ICU)的一项观察性研究数据进行了多水平多变量回归分析。从1153份患者病历中提取营养实践数据,1439名重症护理护士完成了“成年重症患者肠内营养障碍”问卷。我们的主要结局是肠内营养的热量充足率(经肠内摄入的规定热量比例),我们感兴趣的主要预测因素是根据问卷中各项的重要性评分得出的障碍评分。
肠内营养的平均热量充足率为48%(标准差[SD]17%)。对混杂因素的评估确定患者类型、在ICU工作超过5年的护士应答者比例以及地理区域为重要协变量。在一个对这些协变量以及可评估的营养天数和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分进行校正的回归模型中,我们观察到总体障碍评分每增加10分,肠内营养充足率就会降低3.5%(标准误[SE]1.3%)(P值<0.01)。
我们的结果为支持我们的先验假设提供了证据,即障碍会对ICU的营养供应产生负面影响,这表明我们最近编制的问卷可能是识别这些重要因素并指导选择优化营养实践干预措施的一个有前景的工具。需要进一步研究来阐明障碍类型、提供者职业和医院地理位置是否以及如何影响这种关联。