• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施多方面的针对性干预措施以改善危重症患者的营养充足状况:一项多中心可行性研究的结果

Implementing a multifaceted tailored intervention to improve nutrition adequacy in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study.

作者信息

Cahill Naomi E, Murch Lauren, Cook Deborah, Heyland Daren K

出版信息

Crit Care. 2014 May 11;18(3):R96. doi: 10.1186/cc13867.

DOI:10.1186/cc13867
PMID:24887445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4229943/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tailoring interventions to address identified barriers to change may be an effective strategy to implement guidelines and improve practice. However, there is inadequate data to inform the optimal method or level of tailoring. Consequently, we conducted the PERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian nutrition guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy (PERFECTIS) study to determine the feasibility of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary, tailored intervention aimed at improving adherence to critical care nutrition guidelines for the provision of enteral nutrition.

METHODS

A before-after study was conducted in seven ICUs from five hospitals in North America. During a 3-month pre-implementation phase, each ICU completed a nutrition practice audit to identify guideline-practice gaps and a barriers assessment to identify obstacles to practice change. During a one day meeting, the results of the audit and barriers assessment were reviewed and used to develop a site-specific tailored action plan. The tailored action plan was then implemented over a 12-month period that included bi-monthly progress meetings. Compliance with the tailored action plan was determined by the proportion of items in the action plan that was completely implemented. We examined acceptability of the intervention through staff responses to an evaluation questionnaire. In addition, the nutrition practice audit and barriers survey were repeated at the end of the implementation phase to determine changes in barriers and nutrition practices.

RESULTS

All five sites successfully completed all aspects of the study. However, their ability to fully implement all of their developed action plans varied from 14% to 75% compliance. Nurses, on average, rated the study-related activities and resources as 'somewhat useful' and a third of respondents 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' that their nutrition practice had changed as a result of the intervention. We observed a statistically significant 10% (Site range -4.3% to -26.0%) decrease in overall barriers score, and a non-significant 6% (Site range -1.5% to 17.9%) and 4% (-8.3% to 18.2%) increase in the adequacy of total nutrition from calories and protein, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The multifaceted tailored intervention appears to be feasible but further refinement is warranted prior to testing the effectiveness of the approach on a larger scale.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01168128. Registered 21 July 2010.

摘要

引言

针对已确定的变革障碍量身定制干预措施,可能是实施指南并改进实践的有效策略。然而,目前尚无足够的数据来确定最佳的定制方法或程度。因此,我们开展了一项名为“通过定制实施策略提高加拿大营养指南的执行效果(PERFECTIS)”的研究,以确定一项多方面、跨学科的定制干预措施的可行性,该干预旨在提高对提供肠内营养的重症监护营养指南的依从性。

方法

在北美五家医院的七个重症监护病房进行了一项前后对照研究。在为期3个月的实施前阶段,每个重症监护病房完成一次营养实践审核,以确定指南与实践之间的差距,并进行一次障碍评估,以识别实践变革的障碍。在为期一天的会议上,对审核结果和障碍评估结果进行了审查,并用于制定针对特定地点的定制行动计划。然后,在为期12个月的时间内实施该定制行动计划,其中包括每两个月召开一次进展会议。通过行动计划中完全实施的项目比例来确定对定制行动计划的依从性。我们通过工作人员对一份评估问卷的回答来检验干预措施的可接受性。此外,在实施阶段结束时,重复进行营养实践审核和障碍调查,以确定障碍和营养实践的变化。

结果

所有五个地点均成功完成了研究的各个方面。然而,它们全面实施所有已制定行动计划的能力各不相同,依从率从14%到75%不等。护士平均将与研究相关的活动和资源评为“有些有用”,三分之一的受访者“同意”或“强烈同意”他们的营养实践因干预措施而发生了变化。我们观察到总体障碍得分在统计学上显著下降了10%(各地点范围为-4.3%至-26.0%),而热量和蛋白质方面的总营养充足率分别有不显著的6%(各地点范围为-1.5%至17.9%)和4%(-8.3%至18.2%)的增加。

结论

多方面的定制干预措施似乎是可行的,但在更大规模上测试该方法的有效性之前,有必要进一步完善。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01168128。于2010年7月21日注册。

相似文献

1
Implementing a multifaceted tailored intervention to improve nutrition adequacy in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study.实施多方面的针对性干预措施以改善危重症患者的营养充足状况:一项多中心可行性研究的结果
Crit Care. 2014 May 11;18(3):R96. doi: 10.1186/cc13867.
2
Improving the provision of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a description of a multifaceted intervention tailored to overcome local barriers.改善重症监护病房肠内营养的供应:一项针对克服当地障碍的多方面干预措施的描述。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;29(1):110-7. doi: 10.1177/0884533613516512. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
3
Current status and influencing factors of barriers to enteral feeding of critically ill patients: A multicenter study.危重症患者肠内喂养障碍的现状及影响因素:多中心研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(3-4):677-685. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14667. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
4
The validation of a questionnaire to assess barriers to enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a multicenter international survey.一份用于评估重症患者肠内营养障碍的问卷的验证:一项多中心国际调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 1;14:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-197.
5
Validation of the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients: results of a prospective observational study.加拿大机械通气成年危重症患者营养支持临床实践指南的验证:一项前瞻性观察性研究的结果
Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2260-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145581.54571.32.
6
Revised Questionnaire to Assess Barriers to Adequate Nutrition in the Critically Ill.评估危重症患者营养摄入不足障碍的修订问卷。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 May;40(4):511-8. doi: 10.1177/0148607115571015. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
7
Effect of evidence-based feeding guidelines on mortality of critically ill adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial.循证喂养指南对危重症成年患者死亡率的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
JAMA. 2008 Dec 17;300(23):2731-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.826.
8
Barriers to feeding critically ill patients: a multicenter survey of critical care nurses.危重症患者喂养障碍:一项多中心重症监护护士调查。
J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):727-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to assess barriers to feeding critically ill patients.评估危重症患者喂养障碍问卷的编制及信度、效度评价。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 4;8:140. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-140.
10
Maximizing Nutrition Support Practice and Measuring Adherence to Nutrition Support Guidelines in a Canadian Tertiary Care ICU.最大化营养支持实践并测量加拿大三级护理 ICU 中营养支持指南的依从性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;33(3):209-217. doi: 10.1177/0885066617749175. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Making sense of the outcome of a rehabilitation implementation trial in the intensive care unit: Mixed methods.解读重症监护病房康复实施试验的结果:混合方法
South Afr J Crit Care. 2025 May 19;41(1):e2695. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2695.v41i1.2695. eCollection 2025.
2
Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.指南实施趋势:更新的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 23;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01223-6.
3
Extrinsic and intrinsic factors acting as barriers or facilitators in nurses' implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a mixed-method systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
The validation of a questionnaire to assess barriers to enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a multicenter international survey.一份用于评估重症患者肠内营养障碍的问卷的验证:一项多中心国际调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 1;14:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-197.
2
Improving the provision of enteral nutrition in the intensive care unit: a description of a multifaceted intervention tailored to overcome local barriers.改善重症监护病房肠内营养的供应:一项针对克服当地障碍的多方面干预措施的描述。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;29(1):110-7. doi: 10.1177/0884533613516512. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
3
Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to assess barriers to feeding critically ill patients.
外在和内在因素对护士实施临床实践指南的阻碍或促进作用:一项混合方法系统评价。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022252. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12942.
4
Evidence on nutritional therapy practice guidelines and implementation in adult critically ill patients: A systematic scoping review.成人危重症患者营养治疗实践指南及实施的证据:一项系统综述。
Curationis. 2019 Dec 13;42(1):e1-e13. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1973.
5
Evaluation of a minimal sedation protocol using ICU sedative consumption as a monitoring tool: a quality improvement multicenter project.以重症监护病房镇静药物消耗量作为监测工具评估一种最小化镇静方案:一项质量改进多中心项目
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 24;18(5):580. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0580-3.
6
The validation of a questionnaire to assess barriers to enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a multicenter international survey.一份用于评估重症患者肠内营养障碍的问卷的验证:一项多中心国际调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 1;14:197. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-197.
评估危重症患者喂养障碍问卷的编制及信度、效度评价。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 4;8:140. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-140.
4
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
5
Optimal amount of calories for critically ill patients: depends on how you slice the cake!危重症患者的最佳热量摄入:取决于如何切蛋糕!
Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2619-26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318226641d.
6
Creating a culture of clinical excellence in critical care nutrition: the 2008 "Best of the Best" award.创建重症监护营养临床卓越文化:2008 年“最佳中的最佳”奖。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):707-15. doi: 10.1177/0148607110361901.
7
Guidelines, guidelines, guidelines: what are we to do with all of these North American guidelines?指南,指南,还是指南:我们该如何处理所有这些来自北美的指南?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):625-43. doi: 10.1177/0148607110378104.
8
Understanding adherence to guidelines in the intensive care unit: development of a comprehensive framework.理解重症监护病房中对指南的依从性:综合框架的制定。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):616-24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110361904.
9
Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.为克服已确定的变革障碍而量身定制的干预措施:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD005470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2.
10
A practical tool to identify and eliminate barriers to compliance with evidence-based guidelines.一种识别并消除循证指南依从性障碍的实用工具。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Oct;35(10):526-32, 485. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35072-2.