数字化患者社区能否成为以患者为中心的试验设计的起点？
Could digital patient communities be the launch pad for patient-centric trial design?
作者信息
Wicks Paul
机构信息
PatientsLikeMe, 155 2nd Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
出版信息
Trials. 2014 May 15;15:172. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-172.
Abstract
The system of medical discovery does not revolve around patients as unique individuals with preferences, needs, and desires. Rather it revolves around scientific scrutiny, the needs of the sponsor, and the desires for regulatory approval. The patient is only a subject. Is it any wonder, then, that some patients have rejected the current medical paradigm and sought to find their own path?
摘要
医学发现体系并非围绕着作为具有偏好、需求和愿望的独特个体的患者展开。相反，它围绕着科学审查、资助者的需求以及获得监管批准的愿望。患者仅仅是一个研究对象。那么，一些患者拒绝当前的医学范式并试图寻找自己的道路，这有什么奇怪的吗？
相似文献
1
Could digital patient communities be the launch pad for patient-centric trial design?
Trials. 2014 May 15;15:172. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-172.
2
The information needs of people living with ankylosing spondylitis: a questionnaire survey.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 10;13:243. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-243.
3
Estimation of patient knowledge on rheumatoid arthritis in the range of their own disease--preliminary study.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2012 May-Jun;21(3):343-51.
4
Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.
Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):184-194. doi: 10.1177/1740774520901514. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
Scope, Themes, and Medical Accuracy of eHealth Peripheral Artery Disease Community Forums.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
6
Nocebo side-effects in cancer treatment.
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Dec;12(13):1181-2. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70268-6. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
7
Consumer access to health care information: its effect on the physician-patient relationship.
Alaska Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;44(4):75-82.
8
Guiding principles for printed education materials: design preferences of people with aphasia.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Feb;14(1):11-23. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.631583. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
9
Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.005. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
10
Effectiveness of patient feedback as an educational intervention to improve medical student consultation (PTA Feedback Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials. 2014 Sep 17;15:361. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-361.
引用本文的文献
1
Objectives and outcomes of patient-driven innovations published in peer-reviewed journals: a qualitative analysis of publications included in a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):e071363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071363.
2
Patients' Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e29691. doi: 10.2196/29691.
3
Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):e053735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053735.
4
A survey of patients with laryngotracheal stenosis on future clinical trial design.
Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;19(2):194-200. doi: 10.1177/17407745211065744. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Clinical Trial Recruitment and Retention of College Students with Type 1 Diabetes via Social Media: An Implementation Case Study.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):445-456. doi: 10.1177/1932296819839503. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
6
Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 27;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2090-x.
7
Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a crowdsourcing study of two hundred and seventy two patients.
Int Orthop. 2016 Dec;40(12):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3208-1. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Increasing patient participation in drug development.
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Feb;33(2):134-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3145.
本文引用的文献
1
Subjects no more: what happens when trial participants realize they hold the power?
BMJ. 2014 Jan 28;348:g368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g368.
2
"If i wasn't this robust": patients' expectations and experiences at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Conference 2010.
Patient. 2013;6(3):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0017-0.
3
Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences.
BMJ Open. 2013 May 9;3(5):e002241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002241.
4
Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm.
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):411-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1837. Epub 2011 Apr 24.
5
Is the lithium-for-ALS genie back in the bottle?: Not quite.
Neurology. 2010 Aug 17;75(7):586-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ed9ef7. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
6
How the Social Web Supports patient experimentation with a new therapy: The demand for patient-controlled and patient-centered informatics.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:217-21.
7
A clinical trial of creatine in ALS.
Neurology. 2004 Nov 9;63(9):1656-61. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000142992.81995.f0.
Zotero 插件