Hill Nigel, Zhou Hong Ning, Wang Piyu, Guo Xiaofang, Carneiro Ilona, Moore Sarah J
Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo Research and Training Centre, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Malar J. 2014 May 31;13:208. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-208.
Mosquito coils are the most commonly used household insecticidal product in the world with sales exceeding 50 billion coils, used by two billion people worldwide annually. Despite strong evidence that coils prevent mosquito bites a systematic review concluded that there is no evidence that burning mosquito coils prevents malaria acquisition. Therefore, the current trial was designed to measure and compare prevention of malaria infection by mosquito coils or long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) or a combination of the two in Yunnan, China in the Greater Mekong sub-region.
A four-arm single blind household-randomized design was chosen as coils emanate insecticide throughout the household. Households enrolled at baseline were randomly allocated by the lottery method to one of the four intervention arms: (i) nothing, (ii) 0.03% transfluthrin coils alone, (iii) deltamethrin long-lasting insecticide treated nets, (LLINs) alone or (iv) a combination of transfluthrin coils and deltamethrin LLINs. All household members were recruited to the study, with only those households excluded with pregnant or breastfeeding mothers, members with chest complaints or allergies or members that regularly slept away from home. The main outcome of interest was Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence detected by rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) during six repeated monthly cross-sectional surveys. The secondary outcome of interest was the effect on Plasmodium vivax prevalence detected in the same way.
A total of 2,052 households were recruited into the study, comprising 7,341 individuals The odds ratios of testing positive by RDT with P. falciparum or P. vivax were >75% lower for all intervention arms compared with the control arm. Coils alone provided 77% protection (95% CI: 50%-89%), LLINs provided 91% protection (95% CI: 72%-97%) and the combination of coils and LLINs provided 94% protection (95% CI: 77%-99%) against P. falciparum compared with the control arm. There was no statistically significant difference between the protective efficacies of the different interventions.
This is the first robust clinical evaluation of transfluthrin mosquito coils as a means to reduce malaria and the high degree of infection prevented would indicate they represent a potentially highly effective tool, which could be integrated into larger vector control programmes.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00442442, March 2007.
蚊香是世界上最常用的家用杀虫产品,年销量超过500亿盘,全球每年有20亿人使用。尽管有充分证据表明蚊香可防止蚊虫叮咬,但一项系统评价得出结论,没有证据表明燃烧蚊香可预防疟疾感染。因此,本试验旨在在中国云南大湄公河次区域测量和比较蚊香、长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN)或两者组合对疟疾感染的预防效果。
由于蚊香会在整个家庭中散发杀虫剂,因此选择了四臂单盲家庭随机设计。在基线时登记的家庭通过抽签法随机分配到四个干预组之一:(i)不干预,(ii)仅使用0.03%的四氟甲醚菊酯蚊香,(iii)仅使用溴氰菊酯长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN),或(iv)四氟甲醚菊酯蚊香和溴氰菊酯LLIN的组合。所有家庭成员均被纳入研究,只有那些有孕妇或哺乳期母亲、有胸部不适或过敏症状的成员或经常不在家睡觉的成员的家庭被排除在外。主要关注的结局是在每月进行的6次重复横断面调查中,通过快速诊断试验(RDT)检测到的恶性疟原虫疟疾患病率。次要关注的结局是以同样方式检测到的间日疟原虫患病率的影响。
共招募了2052户家庭,包括7341人。与对照组相比,所有干预组通过RDT检测到恶性疟原虫或间日疟原虫呈阳性的比值比降低了75%以上。与对照组相比,仅使用蚊香提供了77%的保护(95%CI:50%-89%),LLIN提供了