Harder Thomas, Takla Anja, Rehfuess Eva, Sánchez-Vivar Alex, Matysiak-Klose Dorothea, Eckmanns Tim, Krause Gérard, de Carvalho Gomes Helena, Jansen Andreas, Ellis Simon, Forland Frode, James Roberta, Meerpohl Joerg J, Morgan Antony, Schünemann Holger, Zuiderent-Jerak Teun, Wichmann Ole
Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 May 21;14:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-69.
The Project on a Framework for Rating Evidence in Public Health (PRECEPT) was initiated and is being funded by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) to define a methodology for evaluating and grading evidence and strength of recommendations in the field of public health, with emphasis on infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control. One of the first steps was to review existing quality appraisal tools (QATs) for individual research studies of various designs relevant to this area, using a question-based approach.
Through team discussions and expert consultations, we identified 20 relevant types of public health questions, which were grouped into six domains, i.e. characteristics of the pathogen, burden of disease, diagnosis, risk factors, intervention, and implementation of intervention. Previously published systematic reviews were used and supplemented by expert consultation to identify suitable QATs. Finally, a matrix was constructed for matching questions to study designs suitable to address them and respective QATs. Key features of each of the included QATs were then analyzed, in particular in respect to its intended use, types of questions and answers, presence/absence of a quality score, and if a validation was performed.
In total we identified 21 QATs and 26 study designs, and matched them. Four QATs were suitable for experimental quantitative study designs, eleven for observational quantitative studies, two for qualitative studies, three for economic studies, one for diagnostic test accuracy studies, and one for animal studies. Included QATs consisted of six to 28 items. Six of the QATs had a summary quality score. Fourteen QATs had undergone at least one validation procedure.
The results of this methodological study can be used as an inventory of potentially relevant questions, appropriate study designs and QATs for researchers and authorities engaged with evidence-based decision-making in infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control.
公共卫生证据评级框架项目(PRECEPT)由欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)发起并资助,旨在定义一种评估和分级公共卫生领域证据及建议强度的方法,重点关注传染病流行病学、预防和控制。第一步是采用基于问题的方法,审查针对该领域各种设计的个体研究的现有质量评估工具(QATs)。
通过团队讨论和专家咨询,我们确定了20种相关类型的公共卫生问题,这些问题被分为六个领域,即病原体特征、疾病负担、诊断、危险因素、干预措施以及干预措施的实施。使用先前发表的系统评价,并辅以专家咨询,以确定合适的QATs。最后,构建了一个矩阵,用于将问题与适合解决这些问题的研究设计及相应的QATs进行匹配。然后分析了每个纳入的QATs的关键特征,特别是其预期用途、问题和答案的类型、是否存在质量评分以及是否进行了验证。
我们总共确定了21种QATs和26种研究设计,并进行了匹配。四种QATs适用于实验性定量研究设计,十一种适用于观察性定量研究,两种适用于定性研究,三种适用于经济学研究,一种适用于诊断试验准确性研究,一种适用于动物研究。纳入的QATs由6至28个项目组成。六种QATs有汇总质量评分。十四种QATs至少经历了一次验证程序。
这项方法学研究的结果可作为清单,供从事传染病流行病学、预防和控制领域循证决策的研究人员和当局参考,其中包含潜在相关问题、适当的研究设计和QATs。