文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期，新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.d5928
PMID:22008217
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3196245/
Abstract

Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate

摘要

随机试验在设计、实施、分析和报告方面的缺陷可能导致干预效果被低估或高估。 Cochrane 协作组用于评估偏倚风险的工具旨在使这一过程更加清晰和准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f7/4788283/6a70cd412766/higj860676.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f7/4788283/6a70cd412766/higj860676.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f7/4788283/6a70cd412766/higj860676.f1_default.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

BMJ. 2011-10-18

[2]
Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review.

BMJ Open. 2019-5-5

[3]
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation.

Syst Rev. 2014-4-15

[4]
Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Five Leading Neurology Journals in 2008 and 2013 Using the Modified "Risk of Bias" Tool.

World Neurosurg. 2017-3

[5]
Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-4-30

[6]
An Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trial Reports Published in Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry Journals.

Int J Prosthodont. 2015

[7]
Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Res Synth Methods. 2013-8-1

[8]
Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research.

J Clin Periodontol. 2012-2

[9]
Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT patient-reported outcome extension: A pooled analysis of 557 trials.

Cancer. 2015-9-15

[10]
Evidence Following Conditional NICE Technology Appraisal Recommendations: A Critical Analysis of Methods, Quality and Risk of Bias.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Thoracoscopic versus conventional thoracotomy for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 25 comparative studies.

Pediatr Surg Int. 2025-9-9

[2]
Efficacy and safety of induction immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Br J Cancer. 2025-9-5

[3]
Is Sham Acupuncture Equally Effective for Primary Insomnia? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Nat Sci Sleep. 2025-8-29

[4]
Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Front Neurosci. 2025-8-20

[5]
Evidence From a Systematic Review of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)/Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MASLD) Fueling Cardiovascular Risk.

Cureus. 2025-8-4

[6]
Integrated acupuncture-pharmacotherapy for perimenopausal insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Neurol. 2025-8-20

[7]
Comparison of the arthroscopic and open surgery for the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation using suture button: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

EFORT Open Rev. 2025-9-4

[8]
The effect of high-intensity interval training on health-related outcomes in obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Physiol. 2025-8-20

[9]
Comprehensive preventive treatments for episodic migraine: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Front Neurol. 2025-8-18

[10]
Efficacy and safety of tafolecimab in Chinese patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025-7-22

本文引用的文献

[1]
A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010-6-18

[2]
Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.

BMJ. 2009-10-19

[3]
Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals for people with HIV.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009-7-8

[4]
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

BMJ. 2008-4-26

[5]
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008-4-21

[6]
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

BMJ. 2008-3-15

[7]
Bias in clinical intervention research.

Am J Epidemiol. 2006-3-15

[8]
Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.

Stat Med. 2004-6-15

[9]
On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.

Biostatistics. 2001-12

[10]
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

BMJ. 2001-7-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索