Vollmer Tanja, Schottstedt Volkmar, Bux Juergen, Walther-Wenke Gabriele, Knabbe Cornelius, Dreier Jens
Institute of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Heart and Diabetes Centre, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Ruhr University Hospital - Bochum University, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
DRK-West Blood Donation Service, Zentrallabor Hagen, Germany.
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jul;12(3):388-95. doi: 10.2450/2014.0175-13. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
There is growing concern on the residual risk of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates in Germany, despite the reduction of the shelf-life of these concentrates and the introduction of bacterial screening. In this study, the applicability of the BactiFlow flow cytometric assay for bacterial screening of platelet concentrates on day 2 or 3 of their shelf-life was assessed in two German blood services. The results were used to evaluate currently implemented or newly discussed screening strategies.
Two thousand and ten apheresis platelet concentrates were tested on day 2 or day 3 after donation using BactiFlow flow cytometry. Reactive samples were confirmed by the BacT/Alert culture system.
Twenty-four of the 2,100 platelet concentrates tested were reactive in the first test by BactiFlow. Of these 24 platelet concentrates, 12 were false-positive and the other 12 were initially reactive. None of the microbiological cultures of the initially reactive samples was positive. Parallel examination of 1,026 platelet concentrates by culture revealed three positive platelet concentrates with bacteria detected only in the anaerobic culture bottle and identified as Staphylococcus species. Two platelet concentrates were confirmed positive for Staphylcoccus epidermidis by culture. Retrospective analysis of the growth kinetics of the bacteria indicated that the bacterial titres were most likely below the diagnostic sensitivity of the BactiFlow assay (<300 CFU/mL) and probably had no transfusion relevance.
The BactiFlow assay is very convenient for bacterial screening of platelet concentrates independently of the testing day and the screening strategy. Although the optimal screening strategy could not be defined, this study provides further data to help achieve this goal.
在德国,尽管血小板浓缩物的保质期缩短且引入了细菌筛查,但人们对其细菌污染的残留风险仍日益担忧。在本研究中,在德国的两个血液服务机构评估了BactiFlow流式细胞术检测法在血小板浓缩物保质期第2天或第3天进行细菌筛查的适用性。结果用于评估当前实施的或新讨论的筛查策略。
使用BactiFlow流式细胞术对2100份单采血小板浓缩物在捐献后第2天或第3天进行检测。反应性样本通过BacT/Alert培养系统进行确认。
在首次检测中,2100份检测的血小板浓缩物中有24份通过BactiFlow检测呈反应性。在这24份血小板浓缩物中,12份为假阳性,另外12份最初呈反应性。最初呈反应性的样本的微生物培养均无阳性结果。通过培养对1026份血小板浓缩物进行平行检测,发现3份血小板浓缩物呈阳性,仅在厌氧培养瓶中检测到细菌,鉴定为葡萄球菌属。通过培养确认2份血小板浓缩物表皮葡萄球菌呈阳性。对细菌生长动力学的回顾性分析表明,细菌滴度很可能低于BactiFlow检测法的诊断灵敏度(<300 CFU/mL),可能与输血无关。
BactiFlow检测法非常便于对血小板浓缩物进行细菌筛查,与检测日期和筛查策略无关。尽管无法确定最佳筛查策略,但本研究提供了进一步的数据以帮助实现这一目标。