McCleery A, Ventura J, Kern R S, Subotnik K L, Gretchen-Doorly D, Green M F, Hellemann G S, Nuechterlein K H
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.039. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Although many studies have assessed cognitive functioning in first-episode schizophrenia (FESz), the pattern and severity of impairment across cognitive domains remain unclear. Moreover, few studies have directly compared the pattern of cognitive performance between FESz and chronic schizophrenia (CSz). In this study we examined the cognitive impairment profile in FESz using a standardized neurocognitive battery (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; MCCB).
MCCB data were compared from 105 FESz patients, 176 CSz patients and 300 non-psychiatric (NP) participants. Mixed model analysis evaluated group differences in MCCB profiles and relative strengths and weaknesses in the MCCB profiles of patients. Clinical implications of MCCB performance were also examined; we compared the proportion of participants from each group who exhibited clinically-significant global cognitive impairment based on the MCCB Overall Composite score.
FESz and CSz showed impaired performance across all MCCB domains relative to NP. With the exception of relative preservation of working memory and social cognition in FESz, the MCCB domain scores were similar in FESz and CSz. The distribution of impairment on the Overall Composite score did not significantly differ between FESz and CSz; compared to NP, both patient groups were overrepresented in moderate and severe impairment categories.
The pattern, magnitude, and distribution of severity of impairment in FESz were similar to that observed in CSz. However, early in the illness, there may be relative sparing of working memory and social cognition.
尽管许多研究已经评估了首发精神分裂症(FESz)患者的认知功能,但认知领域损害的模式和严重程度仍不明确。此外,很少有研究直接比较FESz和慢性精神分裂症(CSz)患者的认知表现模式。在本研究中,我们使用标准化神经认知测试组合(MATRICS共识认知测试组合;MCCB)来检查FESz患者的认知损害情况。
比较了105例FESz患者、176例CSz患者和300名非精神科(NP)参与者的MCCB数据。混合模型分析评估了MCCB测试组合中的组间差异以及患者MCCB测试组合中的相对优势和劣势。还研究了MCCB表现的临床意义;我们根据MCCB总体综合得分比较了每组中表现出具有临床意义的整体认知损害的参与者比例。
相对于NP组,FESz组和CSz组在所有MCCB领域的表现均受损。除FESz组工作记忆和社会认知相对保留外,FESz组和CSz组的MCCB领域得分相似。FESz组和CSz组在总体综合得分上损害的分布没有显著差异;与NP组相比,两个患者组在中度和重度损害类别中的比例均过高。
FESz组损害的模式、程度和严重程度分布与CSz组相似。然而在疾病早期,工作记忆和社会认知可能相对未受影响。