• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业人员对《2005年精神能力法案》所创设的新刑事犯罪的理解。

Care professionals' understanding of the new criminal offences created by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

作者信息

Manthorpe Jill, Samsi Kritika

机构信息

Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;30(4):384-92. doi: 10.1002/gps.4147. Epub 2014 May 30.

DOI:10.1002/gps.4147
PMID:24890855
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Implemented in 2007, the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 codified decision-making for adults unable to make decisions for themselves in England and Wales. Among other changes, two new offences of wilful neglect and ill-treatment were created under Section 44. Our study explored how the MCA was being implemented in community-based dementia care, focusing on frontline practice.

METHOD

Using qualitative longitudinal methodology, we interviewed 279 practitioners, in the London and South-East area of England, two or three times over 3 years. We applied framework analysis to identify and delineate recurrent themes.

RESULTS

Views of the new offences were positive overall, but understanding ranged from partial to non-existent among some participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians may be increasingly called upon to provide advice on whether an alleged victim or perpetrator lacks decision-making capacity in cases of suspected elder abuse. They need to be aware of the new criminal offences to ensure that people with dementia, among others, are not abused and that abusers are brought to account.

摘要

目标

《2005年精神能力法案》(MCA)于2007年实施,将英格兰和威尔士无法自行做决定的成年人的决策过程进行了编纂。除其他变化外,第44条新增了两项故意忽视和虐待的新罪行。我们的研究探讨了MCA在社区痴呆症护理中的实施情况,重点关注一线实践。

方法

我们采用定性纵向研究方法,对英格兰伦敦和东南部地区的279名从业者进行了为期3年的两到三次访谈。我们应用框架分析来识别和描绘反复出现的主题。

结果

总体而言,对新罪行的看法是积极的,但一些参与者的理解程度从部分了解到完全不了解不等。

结论

在涉嫌虐待老年人的案件中,临床医生可能会越来越多地被要求就被指控的受害者或犯罪者是否缺乏决策能力提供建议。他们需要了解新的刑事罪行,以确保痴呆症患者等群体不被虐待,并追究施虐者的责任。

相似文献

1
Care professionals' understanding of the new criminal offences created by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.护理专业人员对《2005年精神能力法案》所创设的新刑事犯罪的理解。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;30(4):384-92. doi: 10.1002/gps.4147. Epub 2014 May 30.
2
"Capacity is key": investigating new legal provisions in England and Wales for adult safeguarding.“能力是关键”:调查英格兰和威尔士新的成年保护法律规定。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2013;25(4):355-73. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.770313.
3
'More of a leg to stand on': views and usage of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 among staff of local Alzheimer's Society and carer organisations.“更有立足之地”:当地阿尔茨海默氏症协会和护理人员组织工作人员对《2005 年精神能力法案》的看法和使用情况。
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(1):102-9. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.628971.
4
Responding to the financial abuse of people with dementia: a qualitative study of safeguarding experiences in England.回应痴呆症患者的财务滥用:英格兰保障经验的定性研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Sep;24(9):1454-64. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000348. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
5
Best interests decisions: professional practices in health and social care.符合患者最佳利益的决策:健康与社会照护中的专业实践
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jan;22(1):78-86. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12066. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
6
What do we know about the application of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) in healthcare practice regarding decision-making for frail and older people? A systematic literature review.关于《精神能力法案》(2005年)在医疗保健实践中针对体弱老年人决策制定方面的应用,我们了解多少?一项系统的文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):295-308. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12310. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Multidisciplinary palliative care teams' understanding of Mental Capacity Act 2005 'best interest' determinations.多学科姑息治疗团队对《2005年精神能力法案》“最佳利益”判定的理解。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2011 Jan;17(1):20-5. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2011.17.1.20.
8
The Mental Capacity Act: a review of the current literature.
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Aug 2;21(8):406-10. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.8.406.
9
Care homes and the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Changes in understanding and practice over time.养老院和 2005 年《精神能力法案》:随着时间的推移理解和实践上的变化。
Dementia (London). 2016 Jul;15(4):858-71. doi: 10.1177/1471301214542623. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.英格兰和威尔士的医疗保健专业人员对涉及无行为能力成年人的研究的立法的理解:一项全国性调查。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;44(9):632-637. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104722. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of mental capacity legislation in care homes for older adults in the United Kingdom: a mixed-methods systematic review.英国养老院实施精神能力立法的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法的系统评价
Age Ageing. 2025 May 3;54(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf119.
2
The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): findings from a pilot study.将一项成人保障措施纳入《成人社会护理成果框架》(ASCOF)的可行性:一项试点研究的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 30;16:209. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1464-9.