• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将一项成人保障措施纳入《成人社会护理成果框架》(ASCOF)的可行性:一项试点研究的结果

The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): findings from a pilot study.

作者信息

Norrie Caroline, Manthorpe Jill, Cartwright Cher, Rayat Pritpal

机构信息

Social Care Workforce Research Unit (SCWRU), King's College London, Strand, London, UK.

Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), 4th Floor North, Trevelyan Square, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 30;16:209. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1464-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-016-1464-9
PMID:27363497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4929787/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are currently no national measures in England reporting the experiences of people who have been involved with adult safeguarding services following concerns that they may be at risk of abuse or neglect. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) aimed to develop a new adult safeguarding outcome measure (survey) for local authorities (LAs) that could be added to the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF). The ASCOF is a national collection of social care outcomes performance indicators collected from the perspective of people receiving partial or total funding from a LA for care services.

METHODS

An outcome measure (a face-to-face interview based survey consisting of 7 questions) was piloted in 40 LAs with 382 adults at risk (or their representative) who had been the subject of a safeguarding investigation. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of the survey in three domains: i) if a statistically representative sample of adults at risk (or their family, friend, carer or advocate) could be recruited; ii) analysis of survey responses and its acceptability to participants iii) feedback from LAs about the survey's administration.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Overall the survey results met statistical confidence; however the individual results for adults at risk did not, due to the high proportion of representatives who responded because adults at risk were unable. Responses to the survey were generally positive; 72 % of participants felt that the help received during the safeguarding investigation had made them or the adult at risk (if reporting as a proxy) feel 'quite a bit' or 'a lot safer'. These results are the most robust data collected in England on the perspectives of adults at risk and their representatives on safeguarding services. Participants reported they appreciated being asked for feedback. LAs suggested survey administration improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey is one way LAs can meet their new legal requirement under the Care Act 2014 to 'seek feedback' from adults at risk about adult safeguarding services. The survey findings provide the first robust evidence that safeguarding services in the main meet their goals of promoting feelings of safety among adults at risk.

摘要

背景

在英格兰,目前尚无全国性措施来报告那些因被认为有遭受虐待或忽视风险而接受成人保护服务的人们的经历。健康与社会护理信息中心(HSCIC)旨在为地方当局(LA)制定一项新的成人保护结果衡量标准(调查),该标准可添加到成人社会护理结果框架(ASCOF)中。ASCOF是从接受地方当局部分或全部护理服务资金的人群角度收集的社会护理结果绩效指标的全国性汇总。

方法

在40个地方当局中,对382名处于风险中的成年人(或其代表)进行了一项结果衡量标准(一项由7个问题组成的面对面访谈式调查)试点,这些成年人曾是保护调查的对象。目的是在三个领域调查该调查的可行性:i)是否能够招募到具有统计学代表性的处于风险中的成年人样本(或其家人、朋友、护理人员或倡导者);ii)分析调查回复及其对参与者的可接受性;iii)地方当局对调查管理的反馈。

结果与讨论

总体而言,调查结果达到了统计置信度;然而,处于风险中的成年人的个体结果未达到,这是因为由于处于风险中的成年人无法回应,由代表回应的比例过高。对调查的回复总体上是积极的;72%的参与者认为在保护调查期间获得的帮助使他们或处于风险中的成年人(如果作为代理人报告)感到“相当”或“安全得多”。这些结果是英格兰收集到的关于处于风险中的成年人及其代表对保护服务看法的最可靠数据。参与者表示他们感谢被征求反馈意见。地方当局提出了调查管理方面的改进建议。

结论

这项调查是地方当局满足其根据2014年《护理法案》提出的新法律要求的一种方式,即“征求”处于风险中的成年人对成人保护服务的反馈意见。调查结果提供了首个有力证据,表明主要的保护服务实现了其促进处于风险中的成年人安全感的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/154dd452785f/12913_2016_1464_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/c4ac1c091b49/12913_2016_1464_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/1c13d0279a5f/12913_2016_1464_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/9ed03778a21e/12913_2016_1464_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/965bd257c12f/12913_2016_1464_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/6f3dd772899b/12913_2016_1464_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/6158361371cf/12913_2016_1464_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/52ce452db4b0/12913_2016_1464_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/154dd452785f/12913_2016_1464_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/c4ac1c091b49/12913_2016_1464_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/1c13d0279a5f/12913_2016_1464_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/9ed03778a21e/12913_2016_1464_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/965bd257c12f/12913_2016_1464_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/6f3dd772899b/12913_2016_1464_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/6158361371cf/12913_2016_1464_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/52ce452db4b0/12913_2016_1464_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e848/4929787/154dd452785f/12913_2016_1464_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): findings from a pilot study.将一项成人保障措施纳入《成人社会护理成果框架》(ASCOF)的可行性:一项试点研究的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun 30;16:209. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1464-9.
2
A modified video-feedback intervention for carers of foster children aged 6 years and under with reactive attachment disorder: a feasibility study and pilot RCT.改良视频反馈干预对 6 岁及以下寄养儿童反应性依恋障碍照顾者的效果:一项可行性研究和初步随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(35):1-106. doi: 10.3310/SLIZ1119.
3
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.择期骨科手术前行为干预以减少饮酒:PRE-OP BIRDS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(12):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24120.
6
Guided self-help for depression in autistic adults: the ADEPT feasibility RCT.孤独症成人抑郁的引导自助:ADEPT 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(68):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta23680.
7
"Keeping Control": A user-led exploratory study of mental health service user experiences of targeted violence and abuse in the context of adult safeguarding in England.《保持控制》:一项由用户主导的探索性研究,探讨了英格兰成人保护背景下心理健康服务使用者遭受针对性暴力和虐待的经历。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e781-e792. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12806. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
8
Exploring the views of being a proxy from the perspective of unpaid carers and paid carers: developing a proxy version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT).从无偿护理者和有偿护理者的角度探索代理角色的观点:开发成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)的代理版本。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4025-1.
9
Sexual risk reduction interventions for patients attending sexual health clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study.针对就诊于性健康诊所的患者的性风险降低干预措施:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(12):1-122. doi: 10.3310/hta23120.
10
Training on domestic violence and child safeguarding in general practice: a mixed method evaluation of a pilot intervention.全科医疗中家庭暴力与儿童保护培训:一项试点干预措施的混合方法评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 4;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0603-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Care professionals' understanding of the new criminal offences created by the Mental Capacity Act 2005.护理专业人员对《2005年精神能力法案》所创设的新刑事犯罪的理解。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;30(4):384-92. doi: 10.1002/gps.4147. Epub 2014 May 30.
2
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
3
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.改善健康的复杂干预措施的设计与评估框架。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.