Brown Tamara, Platt Stephen, Amos Amanda
1 UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
2 Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24(4):551-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku065. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
Smoking is the leading cause of health inequalities in Europe. Adults from lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit than adults from higher SES groups. Smoking cessation support is an important element of tobacco control; however, the equity impact of individual-level cessation support is uncertain.
Systematic review of individual-level smoking cessation interventions delivered in European countries, reporting a smoking cessation outcome (quit) in adults of lower compared with higher SES. Equity impact was assessed as positive (reduced inequality), neutral (no difference by SES), negative (increased inequality) or unclear.
Twenty-nine studies were included using different types of support: behavioural and pharmacological (17); behavioural only (11), including specialist (5), brief advice (1), mass media (2), text-based (1) and Internet-based (2); and pharmacological only (1). The distribution of equity effects on quitting was 10 neutral, 18 negative and 1 unclear. Two national studies of UK National Health Service (NHS) stop-smoking services showed overall positive equity impact on smoking prevalence. The evidence suggests that UK NHS services that target low-SES smokers achieve a relatively higher service uptake among low-SES smokers, which can compensate for their lower quit rates.
Untargeted smoking cessation interventions in Europe may have contributed to reducing adult smoking but are, on balance, likely to have increased inequalities in smoking. However, UK NHS stop-smoking services appear to reduce inequalities in smoking through increased relative reach through targeting services to low-SES smokers. More research is needed to strengthen the evidence-base for reducing smoking inequalities.
吸烟是欧洲健康不平等的主要原因。社会经济地位较低(SES)群体的成年人比社会经济地位较高群体的成年人更有可能吸烟,且戒烟的可能性更小。戒烟支持是烟草控制的一个重要因素;然而,个体层面戒烟支持对公平性的影响尚不确定。
对在欧洲国家实施的个体层面戒烟干预措施进行系统评价,报告社会经济地位较低与较高的成年人的戒烟结果(戒烟)。公平性影响被评估为积极(不平等减少)、中性(社会经济地位无差异)、消极(不平等增加)或不明确。
纳入了29项研究,这些研究使用了不同类型的支持:行为和药物治疗(17项);仅行为治疗(11项),包括专科治疗(5项)、简短建议(1项)、大众媒体(2项)、基于文本(1项)和基于互联网(2项);以及仅药物治疗(1项)。戒烟公平性效应的分布为10项中性、18项消极和1项不明确。两项关于英国国民健康服务(NHS)戒烟服务的全国性研究显示,对吸烟流行率总体上有积极的公平性影响。证据表明,针对低社会经济地位吸烟者的英国国民健康服务能在低社会经济地位吸烟者中实现相对较高的服务利用率,这可以弥补他们较低的戒烟率。
欧洲无针对性的戒烟干预措施可能有助于减少成年人吸烟,但总体而言,可能加剧了吸烟方面的不平等。然而,英国国民健康服务戒烟服务似乎通过将服务目标对准低社会经济地位吸烟者而增加相对覆盖面,从而减少了吸烟方面的不平等。需要更多研究来加强减少吸烟不平等的证据基础。