Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位是否调节了数字行为改变干预措施在戒烟方面的内容和传递特征与干预效果之间的关联?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does socioeconomic position moderate the associations between the content and delivery features of digital behaviour change interventions for smoking cessation and intervention effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Health Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;18(4):790-823. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2366189. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

Prior research indicates that digital smoking cessation interventions can be effective, but little is known about their active ingredients. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the associations of content (behaviour change techniques [BCTs]), delivery features (delivery mode, readability, ease-of-use), and socioeconomic position with effectiveness. Systematic searches and hand searches were conducted from February to June 2023 to identify experimental evaluations of digital smoking cessation interventions published since 2004. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to explore intervention effectiveness. Meta-CART were used to explore whether content, delivery features, or socioeconomic position moderate effectiveness and assessed interactions between potential moderators. Meta-regressions were performed as sensitivity checks. For  = 29 studies ( = 42,662), the authors provided sufficient data and materials for inclusion in the primary analyses. Participants in the intervention groups had greater odds of successfully quitting smoking (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.51, = .002) with similar effect sizes across socioeconomic groups (OR= 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00-1.57, = .048; OR= 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.76, = .017). No delivery features were significantly associated with effectiveness. The BCT 'commitment' was associated with larger effects in populations with high, but not low, socioeconomic positions. There were no significant interactions between potential moderators. Digital smoking cessation interventions are effective across socioeconomic groups. Uncertainty around active ingredients remains.

摘要

先前的研究表明,数字戒烟干预措施可能有效,但人们对其有效成分知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在考察内容(行为改变技术[BCTs])、传递特征(传递模式、可读性、易用性)和社会经济地位与效果的关联。从 2023 年 2 月至 6 月,系统检索和手工检索旨在确定自 2004 年以来发表的数字戒烟干预措施的实验评估。使用随机效应荟萃分析来探索干预效果。使用 Meta-CART 探索内容、传递特征或社会经济地位是否调节效果,并评估潜在调节因素之间的相互作用。进行荟萃回归作为敏感性检查。对于 29 项研究(= 42662),作者提供了足够的数据和材料进行主要分析。干预组的参与者成功戒烟的几率更高(OR=1.29,95%CI:1.10-1.51,=0.002),且在社会经济群体中效果大小相似(OR=1.25,95%CI:1.00-1.57,=0.048;OR=1.36,95%CI:1.06-1.76,=0.017)。没有传递特征与效果显著相关。“承诺”BCT 与高社会经济地位人群的效果更大相关,而与低社会经济地位人群的效果不相关。潜在调节因素之间没有显著的相互作用。数字戒烟干预措施在社会经济群体中均有效。有效成分的不确定性仍然存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验