Gögen H
Turk Ortodonti Derg. 1989 Apr;2(1):51-63.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes occurring during Edgewise and Begg technique therapies in skeletal open-bite cases and to compare the two techniques. The material consists of 60 lateral cephalometric films of 30 patients with hyperdivergent skeletal structure, 10 had been treated by Standard Edgewise Technique, the other 10 by Begg technique and the remaining 10 had been used as the Control group which had no treatment. 18 variables were included in the study. To determine the homogeneity of the three groups pretreatment (control) values were examined. Next, the pre and posttreatment (control) values of all the three groups were investigated and they were compared with each other. The overall results show that Edgewise technique restricted the growth of point A more than the Begg technique. The two techniques restricted the spontaneous growth of the mandible, Edgewise technique showed posterior rotation of the mandible in relation to the Begg technique.
本研究的目的是调查骨骼性开(牙合)病例在方丝弓技术和Begg技术治疗过程中发生的变化,并比较这两种技术。研究材料包括30例高角骨骼型患者的60张头颅侧位片,其中10例采用标准方丝弓技术治疗,另外10例采用Begg技术治疗,其余10例作为未治疗的对照组。本研究纳入了18个变量。为确定三组的同质性,对治疗前(对照)值进行了检查。接下来,对所有三组的治疗前和治疗后(对照)值进行了研究,并相互比较。总体结果表明,方丝弓技术比Begg技术更能限制A点的生长。两种技术都限制了下颌骨的自然生长,与Begg技术相比,方丝弓技术显示下颌骨向后旋转。