Suppr超能文献

中线剖腹术筋膜伤口闭合的两种技术研究

Study of two techniques for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure.

作者信息

Gurjar Vipul, Halvadia B M, Bharaney R P, Ajwani Vicky, Shah S M, Rai Samir, Trivedi Mitesh

机构信息

Om-Swami, Doctor House, A-1-Duplex, Swaminarayan Nagar Ayurvedic College Road, Panigate, Vadodara, 390019 India ; Department of General Surgery, SBKS Medical College, Sumandeep University, Piparia, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2014 Apr;76(2):91-4. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0612-7. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

Abstract

To study the results of two techniques, simple interrupted closure and continuous with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure. A random selection of 200 midline laparotomy cases was done. In one group (group A) of 100 cases, midline fascial wound closure was done with continuous sutures with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique using Prolene No. 1 suture material. In the other group (group B) of 100 cases, closure was done with the technique of simple interrupted sutures with Prolene No.1 suture material. Comparison of both the techniques regarding preoperative status and postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, suture sinus formation, stitch granuloma, and chronic wound pain was done according to clinical examination and recorded in the pro forma prepared. In group A, postoperative complications were incisional hernia 3 %, wound dehiscence 4 %, and suture sinus formation 1 %. In group B, postoperative complication were incisional hernia 5 %, wound dehiscence 4 %, and suture sinus formation 1 %. All these complications were statistically insignificant, in both group comparisons. While the complication such as stitch granuloma 3 %, chronic wound pain 3 %, and wound infection 4 % in group A was significantly less than in group B where the complication of stitch granuloma was 12 %, chronic wound pain 13 %, and wound infection 13 % (P value 0.03, P value 0.018, and P value 0.048, respectively). Both the techniques, simple interrupted suture closure and continuous with intermittent Aberdeen knot closure for midline laparotomy fascial wounds, show a similar rate of postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and suture sinus formation. But the continuous suturing with intermittent Aberdeen knot technique is a better option to prevent complications such as stitch granuloma, chronic wound pain, and wound infection, which are higher in the simple interrupted fascial wound closure technique.

摘要

为研究两种技术,即单纯间断缝合法和连续加间断阿伯丁结缝合法用于中线剖腹术筋膜伤口闭合的效果。随机选取200例中线剖腹术病例。在100例的一组(A组)中,使用1号普理灵缝线材料,采用连续缝线加间断阿伯丁结技术进行中线筋膜伤口闭合。在另一组100例(B组)中,使用1号普理灵缝线材料,采用单纯间断缝合法进行闭合。根据临床检查对两种技术在术前状态以及术后并发症,如切口疝、伤口裂开、缝线窦形成、缝线肉芽肿和慢性伤口疼痛方面进行比较,并记录在预先准备的表格中。A组术后并发症为切口疝3%、伤口裂开4%、缝线窦形成1%。B组术后并发症为切口疝5%、伤口裂开4%、缝线窦形成1%。在两组比较中,所有这些并发症在统计学上均无显著差异。而A组中缝线肉芽肿3%、慢性伤口疼痛3%、伤口感染4%等并发症明显少于B组,B组中缝线肉芽肿并发症为12%、慢性伤口疼痛13%、伤口感染13%(P值分别为0.03、0.018和0.048)。对于中线剖腹术筋膜伤口,单纯间断缝合法和连续加间断阿伯丁结缝合法这两种技术在术后并发症如切口疝、伤口裂开和缝线窦形成方面显示出相似的发生率。但连续加间断阿伯丁结缝合法是预防缝线肉芽肿、慢性伤口疼痛和伤口感染等并发症的更好选择,这些并发症在单纯间断筋膜伤口闭合技术中发生率更高。

相似文献

1
Study of two techniques for midline laparotomy fascial wound closure.中线剖腹术筋膜伤口闭合的两种技术研究
Indian J Surg. 2014 Apr;76(2):91-4. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0612-7. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验