J Adhes Dent. 2014 Jun;16(3):277-83. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a32072.
To evaluate the effect of QMix and other conventional endodontic irrigants on the micropush-out bond strength of Biodentine (BD) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA).
One hundred eighty midroot dentin slices with a thickness of 1.0 mm were prepared. BD and WMTA were placed inside the lumens of the root slices (n = 90). Then the specimens of each material were divided into 6 groups (n = 15) according to irrigation solution (saline, 5.25% NaOCl, 2% CHX, 17% EDTA, or QMix) immersed in the same for 30 min. For the control group, a wet cotton pellet was placed over the specimen. After that, the micropush-out bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, and the bond failure mode was determined using a stereomicroscope. The morphological microstructures of specimens were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test.
BD revealed higher bond strength than WMTA (p < 0.05). WMTA was significantly affected after exposure to 2% CHX solution. QMix irrigant did not compromise the bond strength of BD or WMTA. Most failures for BD were cohesive, while for WMTA, adhesive failures were the predominant type. A substantial change in the microstructure of BD and WMTA occurred after exposure to different irrigation solutions.
QMix did not affect the bond strength of BD or WMTA. BD showed higher resistance than WMTA to dislodgement forces from root dentin.
评价 QMix 等常规根管冲洗剂对 Biodentine(BD)和白色矿物三氧化物聚合体(WMTA)的微推出粘结强度的影响。
制备 180 个厚度为 1.0mm 的中根牙本质切片。BD 和 WMTA 被放置在根管切片的管腔内部(n=90)。然后,根据冲洗液(生理盐水、5.25%次氯酸钠、2%洗必泰、17% EDTA 或 QMix)将每种材料的样本分为 6 组(n=15),浸泡 30 分钟。对于对照组,将湿棉片放置在样本上。之后,使用万能试验机测定微推出粘结强度,并使用体视显微镜确定粘结破坏模式。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估样本的形态微观结构。使用方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验对数据进行分析。
BD 的粘结强度高于 WMTA(p<0.05)。WMTA 在暴露于 2%洗必泰溶液后受到显著影响。QMix 冲洗剂不会损害 BD 或 WMTA 的粘结强度。BD 的大多数失效模式为内聚性失效,而 WMTA 的主要失效模式为黏附性失效。BD 和 WMTA 的微观结构在暴露于不同冲洗液后发生了实质性变化。
QMix 不会影响 BD 或 WMTA 的粘结强度。BD 比 WMTA 更能抵抗来自根管牙本质的脱位力。