Cortés Buelvas Armando
Pathology Department in the School of Health, Universidad del Valle E-mail address:
Colomb Med (Cali). 2013 Dec 31;44(4):236-42. eCollection 2013 Oct.
The red cells transfusion is a mainstay in the treatment of anemic patients. These blood transfusions are not without risks. The risk-benefit profile for red cell transfusions to treat anaemia is uncertain, but they may contribute to adverse patient outcomes in some situations. The ability of a patient to tolerate anaemia depends on their clinical condition and the presence of any significant co-morbidity; maintenance of circulating volume is of paramount importance. There is no universal transfusion trigger. Advances in the development and validation of physiological, accessible, practical and reliable markers to guide therapy are expected. To improve patients' outcomes, further study is required to more fully explore the risk of anemia, optimal hemoglobin level, and the risk and efficacy of RBC transfusion. Future clinical investigations with high priority should determine the efficacy of transfusion in those classified as uncertain scenarios. In the absence of data, it is prudent that transfusion is administered with caution in these clinical scenarios.
红细胞输血是贫血患者治疗的主要手段。这些输血并非没有风险。用于治疗贫血的红细胞输血的风险效益情况尚不确定,但在某些情况下可能会导致不良的患者结局。患者耐受贫血的能力取决于其临床状况以及是否存在任何严重的合并症;维持循环血容量至关重要。不存在通用的输血触发阈值。预计在开发和验证用于指导治疗的生理、可获取、实用且可靠的标志物方面会取得进展。为改善患者结局,需要进一步研究以更全面地探究贫血风险、最佳血红蛋白水平以及红细胞输血的风险和疗效。未来具有高度优先性的临床研究应确定在那些分类为不确定情况的患者中输血的疗效。在缺乏数据的情况下,在这些临床场景中谨慎进行输血是明智的。