• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病照料者负担的维度:验证性因素分析及扎里特负担访谈的相关因素

Dimensionality of burden in Alzheimer caregivers: confirmatory factor analysis and correlates of the Zarit Burden interview.

作者信息

Cheng Sheung-Tak, Kwok Timothy, Lam Linda C W

机构信息

Department of Health and Physical Education, Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.

Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Sep;26(9):1455-1463. doi: 10.1017/S104161021400101X.

DOI:10.1017/S104161021400101X
PMID:24892872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate dimensions of caregiver burden through factor analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), and to examine predictors of different dimensions of burden.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analyses were performed on 395 Hong Kong Chinese Alzheimer caregivers to examine whether several proposed factor structures fit the data well. Subsequently, participants were split into two roughly equal subsamples, for the purpose of identifying the most optimal factor structure through exploratory factor analysis in Sample A ( = 183) and an independent verification through confirmatory factor analysis in Sample B ( = 212). ZBI subscales representing the established factors were correlated with caregiver and care-recipient variables known to be associated with burden.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analyses showed that factor models reported elsewhere did not fit the data well. Subsequently, exploratory factor analysis in Sample A suggested a 4-factor structure. After dropping three items due to poor factor loadings, the 4-factor structure was found to fit the data moderately well in Sample B. The four factors tapped personal strain, captivity, self-criticism, and loss of control. However, self-criticism was basically unrelated to the other three factors and showed a rather different pattern of correlations with caregiver and care-recipient variables. Self-criticism was more common among child caregivers and those who did not live with the care-recipient and was less involved in day-to-day care, yet feeling obligated and close to the care-recipient.

CONCLUSIONS

The dimensions of caregiver burden may be culturally specific. More research is needed to examine cultural considerations in measuring caregiver burden.

摘要

背景

通过对 Zarit 负担访谈量表(ZBI)进行因子分析来探究照顾者负担的维度,并检验不同负担维度的预测因素。

方法

对 395 名香港华裔阿尔茨海默病患者照顾者进行验证性因子分析,以检验几种提出的因子结构是否与数据拟合良好。随后,将参与者分成两个大致相等的子样本,目的是通过样本 A(n = 183)中的探索性因子分析确定最优因子结构,并通过样本 B(n = 212)中的验证性因子分析进行独立验证。代表已确定因子的 ZBI 分量表与已知与负担相关的照顾者和受照顾者变量进行相关分析。

结果

验证性因子分析表明,其他地方报道的因子模型与数据拟合不佳。随后,样本 A 中的探索性因子分析提出了一个四因子结构。由于因子载荷较差剔除三个项目后,发现该四因子结构在样本 B 中与数据拟合程度中等。这四个因子分别反映了个人压力、受限感、自我批评和失去控制感。然而,自我批评与其他三个因子基本无关,并且在与照顾者和受照顾者变量的相关模式上有相当大的差异。自我批评在儿童照顾者以及那些不与受照顾者同住且较少参与日常照顾,但感到有义务且与受照顾者关系密切的照顾者中更为常见。

结论

照顾者负担的维度可能具有文化特异性。需要更多研究来考察测量照顾者负担时的文化因素。

相似文献

1
Dimensionality of burden in Alzheimer caregivers: confirmatory factor analysis and correlates of the Zarit Burden interview.阿尔茨海默病照料者负担的维度:验证性因素分析及扎里特负担访谈的相关因素
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Sep;26(9):1455-1463. doi: 10.1017/S104161021400101X.
2
Trajectories of Multidimensional Caregiver Burden in Chinese Informal Caregivers for Dementia: Evidence from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview.痴呆症中国非正规照护者多维照护者负担的轨迹:Zarit 负担访谈的探索性和验证性因子分析证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(4):1317-1325. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170172.
3
Investigating psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Zarit Burden Interview using rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis.使用拉施模型和验证性因素分析研究泰语版扎里特负担访谈量表的心理测量学特性。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Mar 2;13(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-04967-w.
4
Factor analyses of the Chinese Zarit Burden Interview among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in a rural Chinese community.中国农村社区精神分裂症患者照料者的中文版 Zarit 负担访谈的因素分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 29;7(9):e015621. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015621.
5
Confirmatory factor analysis of a brief version of the Zarit Burden Interview in Black and White dementia caregivers.对 Zarit 负担访谈简短版在黑人和白人痴呆症照顾者中的验证性因子分析。
Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):453-62. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr011. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
6
Factors emerging from the "Zarit Burden Interview" and predictive variables in a UK sample of caregivers for people with dementia.“Zarit 负担访谈”中出现的因素及英国痴呆症患者照顾者样本中的预测变量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Nov;30(11):1671-1678. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000315. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
A validation of the Croatian version of Zarit Burden Interview and clinical predictors of caregiver burden in informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a cross-sectional study.《Zarit 负担访谈克罗地亚语版的验证及痴呆患者非专业照护者负担的临床预测因素:一项横断面研究》
Croat Med J. 2020 Dec 31;61(6):527-537. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.527.
8
Neuropsychiatric symptom clusters of Alzheimer disease in Hong Kong Chinese: correlates with caregiver burden and depression.香港华人阿尔茨海默病的神经精神症状群:与照料者负担和抑郁的相关性。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;21(10):1029-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.041. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Delineating Care Recipient Burden Constructs: Development and Validation of the CARE-2B Scale for Care Recipient Self-Perceived Burden and Proxy Assessment of Caregiver Burden.界定受照护者负担构成要素:用于受照护者自我感知负担及照顾者负担代理评估的CARE-2B量表的开发与验证
Gerontologist. 2025 Mar 25;65(4). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae143.
10
Redefining caregiver strain for family caregivers in end-of-life care in Hong Kong.重新定义香港临终关怀中家庭照顾者的照顾压力。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Aug;22(4):767-774. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000020.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Caregivers of People with Motor Neurone Disease: A Scoping Review of Psychosocial Outcomes.运动神经元病患者照料者的非药物干预措施:心理社会结局的范围综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 24;15(2):112. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020112.
2
Randomized controlled trial of a positive emotion regulation intervention to reduce stress in family caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease: protocol and design for the LEAF 2.0 study.阿尔茨海默病患者家属压力的积极情绪调节干预的随机对照试验:LEAF 2.0 研究的方案和设计。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04817-5.
3
Burden and Depression among Empirically-Derived Subgroups of Family Caregivers for Individuals With Dementia.
基于经验的痴呆症患者家庭照顾者亚组的负担和抑郁情况。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2024 Mar;37(2):163-172. doi: 10.1177/08919887231195217. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
4
Assessing the psychometric properties of persian version of Zarit Burden interview among family caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis.评估波斯语版 Zarit 负担访谈量表在多发性硬化症患者家庭照顾者中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 6;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01260-6.
5
Development and validation of the caregiver needs and resources assessment.照顾者需求与资源评估的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 17;14:1063440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1063440. eCollection 2023.
6
Combining a variable-centered and a person-centered analytical approach to caregiving burden - a holistic approach.将变量中心分析方法和个体中心分析方法相结合用于评估照料负担——一种整体方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02238-2.
7
A validation of the Croatian version of Zarit Burden Interview and clinical predictors of caregiver burden in informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a cross-sectional study.《Zarit 负担访谈克罗地亚语版的验证及痴呆患者非专业照护者负担的临床预测因素:一项横断面研究》
Croat Med J. 2020 Dec 31;61(6):527-537. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.527.
8
Worry about Performance: Unravelling the Relationship between 'Doing More' and 'Doing Better'.担心表现:揭开“做得更多”和“做得更好”之间的关系。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1225-7.
9
Exploration of the Factor Structure of the Burden Experienced by Individuals Providing End-of-Life Care at Home.居家临终关怀提供者所承受负担的因素结构探索。
Nurs Res Pract. 2018 Jul 22;2018:1659040. doi: 10.1155/2018/1659040. eCollection 2018.
10
Worry About Caregiving Performance: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.对护理表现的担忧:一项验证性因素分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 22;5:79. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00079. eCollection 2018.