• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对护理表现的担忧:一项验证性因素分析。

Worry About Caregiving Performance: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

作者信息

Li Ruijie, Chong Mei Sian, Chan Peng Chew Mark, Tay Bee Gek Laura, Ali Noorhazlina Binte, Lim Wee Shiong

机构信息

Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.

Biostatistics and Health Informatics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 22;5:79. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00079. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2018.00079
PMID:29623277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5874286/
Abstract

Recent studies on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) support the existence of a unique factor, worry about caregiving performance (WaP), beyond role and personal strain. Our current study aims to confirm the existence of WaP within the multidimensionality of ZBI and to determine if predictors of WaP differ from the role and personal strain. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on 466 caregiver-patient dyads to compare between one-factor (total score), two-factor (role/personal strain), three-factor (role/personal strain and WaP), and four-factor models (role strain split into two factors). We conducted linear regression analyses to explore the relationships between different ZBI factors with socio-demographic and disease characteristics, and investigated the stage-dependent differences between WaP with role and personal strain by dyadic relationship. The four-factor structure that incorporated WaP and split role strain into two factors yielded the best fit. Linear regression analyses reveal that different variables significantly predict WaP (adult child caregiver and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity) from role/personal strain (adult child caregiver, instrumental activities of daily living, and NPI-Q distress). Unlike other factors, WaP was significantly endorsed in early cognitive impairment. Among spouses, WaP remained low across Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) stages until a sharp rise in CDR 3; adult child and sibling caregivers experience a gradual rise throughout the stages. Our results affirm the existence of WaP as a unique factor. Future research should explore the potential of WaP as a possible intervention target to improve self-efficacy in the milder stages of burden.

摘要

近期关于 Zarit 负担访谈(ZBI)的研究支持了一个独特因素的存在,即除了角色负担和个人压力之外,对护理表现的担忧(WaP)。我们当前的研究旨在确认 WaP 在 ZBI 的多维度结构中是否存在,并确定 WaP 的预测因素是否与角色负担和个人压力不同。我们对 466 对照顾者 - 患者二元组进行了验证性因素分析(CFA),以比较单因素模型(总分)、双因素模型(角色/个人压力)、三因素模型(角色/个人压力和 WaP)和四因素模型(角色压力分为两个因素)。我们进行了线性回归分析,以探讨不同 ZBI 因素与社会人口学和疾病特征之间的关系,并通过二元关系研究 WaP 与角色负担和个人压力之间的阶段依赖性差异。纳入 WaP 并将角色压力分为两个因素的四因素结构拟合效果最佳。线性回归分析表明,不同变量对 WaP(成年子女照顾者和神经精神科问卷(NPI - Q)严重程度)的预测与对角色/个人压力(成年子女照顾者、日常生活工具性活动和 NPI - Q 痛苦)的预测显著不同。与其他因素不同,WaP 在早期认知障碍中得到显著认可。在配偶中,WaP 在临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)各阶段一直较低,直到 CDR 3 时急剧上升;成年子女和兄弟姐妹照顾者在各个阶段经历逐渐上升。我们的结果证实了 WaP 作为一个独特因素的存在。未来的研究应探索 WaP 作为一个可能的干预靶点的潜力,以在负担较轻的阶段提高自我效能感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007f/5874286/b5275871f1ec/fmed-05-00079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007f/5874286/b5275871f1ec/fmed-05-00079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007f/5874286/b5275871f1ec/fmed-05-00079-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Worry About Caregiving Performance: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.对护理表现的担忧:一项验证性因素分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 22;5:79. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00079. eCollection 2018.
2
Worry about performance: a unique dimension of caregiver burden.对表现的担忧:照顾者负担的一个独特维度。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):677-86. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002445. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
3
[Caregiver burden in dementia: evaluation with a Japanese version of the Zarit caregiver burden interview].[痴呆症中的照顾者负担:使用日语版的 Zarit 照顾者负担访谈进行评估]
No To Shinkei. 1998 Jun;50(6):561-7.
4
Trajectories of Multidimensional Caregiver Burden in Chinese Informal Caregivers for Dementia: Evidence from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview.痴呆症中国非正规照护者多维照护者负担的轨迹:Zarit 负担访谈的探索性和验证性因子分析证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(4):1317-1325. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170172.
5
Worry about Performance: Unravelling the Relationship between 'Doing More' and 'Doing Better'.担心表现:揭开“做得更多”和“做得更好”之间的关系。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1225-7.
6
Multidimensionality of the Zarit Burden Interview across the severity spectrum of cognitive impairment: an Asian perspective.Zarit 负担访谈在认知障碍严重程度谱上的多维性:亚洲视角。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Nov;24(11):1846-54. doi: 10.1017/S104161021200110X. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Factors emerging from the "Zarit Burden Interview" and predictive variables in a UK sample of caregivers for people with dementia.“Zarit 负担访谈”中出现的因素及英国痴呆症患者照顾者样本中的预测变量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Nov;30(11):1671-1678. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000315. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Short Version Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-9) for Caregivers of Persons With Cognitive Impairment.发展和验证多维简短版 Zarit 负担量表(ZBI-9)用于评估认知障碍患者的照顾者。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2023;37(1):59-65. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000537. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Burden among Family Caregivers of Dementia in the Oldest-Old: An Exploratory Study.高龄老人中痴呆症家庭照顾者的负担:一项探索性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Nov 22;4:205. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00205. eCollection 2017.
10
Caregiver burden in atypical dementias: comparing frontotemporal dementia, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and Alzheimer's disease.非典型痴呆中的照料负担:额颞叶痴呆、克雅氏病与阿尔茨海默病的比较
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Feb;28(2):269-73. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001647. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview: Psychometric Properties in Family Caregivers of People with Intellectual Disabilities.扎里特照顾者负担访谈:智障人士家庭照顾者的心理测量特性
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Feb 5;13(2):391-402. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13020029.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Zarit Burden Interview in Informal Caregivers of Persons With Intellectual Disabilities.智力残疾者非正式照料者中 Zarit 负担访谈的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:792805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792805. eCollection 2022.
3
"He Just Doesn't Want to Get Out of the Chair and Do It": The Impact of Apathy in People with Dementia on Their Carers.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden among Family Caregivers of Dementia in the Oldest-Old: An Exploratory Study.高龄老人中痴呆症家庭照顾者的负担:一项探索性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Nov 22;4:205. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00205. eCollection 2017.
2
Measurement invariance across educational levels and gender in 12-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) on caregivers of people with dementia.12 项 Zarit 负担访谈(ZBI)在痴呆患者照顾者中,跨教育水平和性别具有测量不变性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Nov;29(11):1841-1848. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001417. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
Trajectories of Multidimensional Caregiver Burden in Chinese Informal Caregivers for Dementia: Evidence from Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview.
“他就是不想从椅子上起来做这件事”:痴呆症患者的冷漠对其照顾者的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;18(12):6317. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126317.
4
Combining a variable-centered and a person-centered analytical approach to caregiving burden - a holistic approach.将变量中心分析方法和个体中心分析方法相结合用于评估照料负担——一种整体方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02238-2.
5
Worry about Performance: Unravelling the Relationship between 'Doing More' and 'Doing Better'.担心表现:揭开“做得更多”和“做得更好”之间的关系。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1225-7.
痴呆症中国非正规照护者多维照护者负担的轨迹:Zarit 负担访谈的探索性和验证性因子分析证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(4):1317-1325. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170172.
4
Measuring burden in dementia caregivers: Confirmatory factor analysis for short forms of the Zarit Burden Interview.衡量痴呆症照料者的负担: Zarit负担访谈简表的验证性因素分析
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Jan-Feb;68:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review.干预措施在支持痴呆症患者非专业照护者自我管理方面的有效性:系统元分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Nov 11;15:147. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6.
6
"I should be doing more for my parent:" Chinese adult children's worry about performance in providing care for their oldest-old parents.“我应该为我的父母做得更多”:中国成年子女对照顾高龄父母表现的担忧
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Feb;28(2):303-15. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001726. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
7
Translating Evidence-Based Dementia Caregiving Interventions into Practice: State-of-the-Science and Next Steps.将基于证据的痴呆症护理干预措施转化为实践:科学现状与后续步骤
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):210-26. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu123. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Validating a Cantonese short version of the Zarit Burden Interview (CZBI-Short) for dementia caregivers.验证用于痴呆症照料者的粤语简短版 Zarit 负担访谈量表(CZBI-Short)。
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Sep;20(9):996-1001. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1047323. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
Caregiver Burden: Looking Beyond the Unidimensional Total Score.照顾者负担:超越单维度总分的考量
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015 Oct-Dec;29(4):338-46. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000085.
10
Dimensionality of burden in Alzheimer caregivers: confirmatory factor analysis and correlates of the Zarit Burden interview.阿尔茨海默病照料者负担的维度:验证性因素分析及扎里特负担访谈的相关因素
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Sep;26(9):1455-1463. doi: 10.1017/S104161021400101X.