Mager Diana R, Kazer Meredith W, Conelius Jaclyn, Shea Joyce, Lippman Doris T, Torosyan Roben, Nantz Kathryn
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014 Jun 3;11:/j/ijnes.ahead-of-print/ijnes-2013-0019/ijnes-2013-0019.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0019.
For many years, an area of research in higher education has been emerging around the development and implementation of fair and effective peer evaluation programs. Recently, a new body of knowledge has developed regarding the development and implementation of fair and effective peer evaluation programs resulting in formative and summative evaluations. The purpose of this article is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a peer review of teaching (PRoT) program for nursing faculty, initiated at one small comprehensive university in the northeastern United States. Pairs of nursing faculty evaluated each other's teaching, syllabi, and course materials after collaborating in a pre-evaluation conference to discuss goals of the classroom visit. Qualitative data gathered in post project focus groups revealed that faculty found their modified PRoT process to be a mutually beneficial experience that was more useful, flexible and collegial, and less stressful than their previous evaluation process.
多年来,围绕公平有效的同行评估项目的开发与实施,高等教育领域的一个研究方向正在兴起。最近,关于公平有效的同行评估项目的开发与实施,已经形成了新的知识体系,包括形成性评估和总结性评估。本文旨在描述美国东北部一所小型综合性大学发起的护理教师教学同行评审(PRoT)项目的开发、实施和评估情况。护理教师两两一组,在预评估会议上合作讨论课堂访问目标后,互相评估对方的教学、教学大纲和课程材料。项目结束后焦点小组收集的定性数据显示,教师们发现他们改进后的PRoT流程是一次互利的经历,比之前的评估流程更有用、更灵活、更具合作性,压力也更小。