Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果的公开报告:有利有弊。

Public reporting of PCI outcomes: for better or for worse.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Jul;16(7):500. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0500-9.

Abstract

Public reporting of PCI outcomes has had a polarizing effect on the cardiology community. The potential benefits of public reporting are many, but a host of unintended consequences have likely mitigated the anticipated positive impact of current reporting systems. In this review, we discuss what the goals of public disclosure are, the limitations of current reporting systems and the resultant unintended consequences. We also offer a perspective on future directions with a view to ensuring the benefits of public reporting while minimizing the risk of unintended consequences.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果的公开报告对心脏病学界产生了两极分化的影响。公开报告具有诸多潜在益处,但一系列意想不到的后果可能减轻了当前报告系统预期的积极影响。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了公开披露的目标、当前报告系统的局限性以及由此产生的意想不到的后果。我们还对未来的方向提出了看法,以确保公开报告的益处,同时最大限度地减少意想不到的后果的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验