Rosen Diane
State University of New York, Suffern, NY.
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2014 Jul;18(3):329-343.
Dada, a self-proclaimed (anti)art (non)movement, took shape in 1916 among a group of writers and artists who rejected the traditions of a stagnating bourgeoisie. Instead, they adopted means of creative expression that embraced chaos, stoked instability and undermined logic, an outburst that overturned centuries of classical and Romantic aesthetics. Paradoxically, this insistence on disorder foreshadowed a new order in understanding creativity. Nearly one hundred years later, Nonlinear Dynamical Systems theory (NDS) gives renewed currency to Dada's visionary perspective on chance, chaos and creative cognition. This paper explores commonalities between NDS-theory and this early precursor of the nonlinear paradigm, suggesting that their conceptual synergy illuminates what it means to 'be creative' beyond the disciplinary boundaries of either. Key features are discussed within a 5P model of creativity based on Rhodes' 4P framework (Person, Process, Press, Product), to which I add Participant-Viewer for the interactivity of observer-observed. Grounded in my own art practice, several techniques are then put forward as non-methodical methods that invoke creative border zones, those regions where Dada's chance and design are wedded in a dialectical tension of opposites.
达达主义,一个自称的(反)艺术(非)运动,于1916年在一群拒绝停滞不前的资产阶级传统的作家和艺术家中形成。相反,他们采用了包含混乱、加剧不稳定和破坏逻辑的创造性表达手段,这一爆发颠覆了几个世纪以来的古典和浪漫美学。矛盾的是,这种对无序的坚持预示着理解创造力的一种新秩序。近一百年后,非线性动力系统理论(NDS)使达达主义关于机遇、混沌和创造性认知的有远见的观点重新流行起来。本文探讨了NDS理论与这个非线性范式的早期先驱之间的共性,表明它们的概念协同作用阐明了超越两者学科界限的“具有创造性”意味着什么。基于罗兹的4P框架(人、过程、压力、产品),在一个创造力的5P模型中讨论了关键特征,我在此基础上增加了参与者-观察者,以体现观察者与被观察者的互动性。基于我自己的艺术实践,随后提出了几种技术,作为引发创造性边界区域的非方法性方法,在这些区域中,达达主义的机遇与设计在对立的辩证张力中结合在一起。