Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstr. 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Phytother Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):1676-8. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5181. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
Two exploratory clinical studies investigating proprietary pomegranate products showed a trend of effectiveness in increasing prostate-specific antigen doubling time in patients with prostate cancer. A recent clinical study did not support these results. We therefore analysed a lot of the marketed pomegranate blend for co-active pomegranate compounds. The high-performance liquid chromatography method was used to detect punicalagin, ellagic acid and anthocyanins. Total polyphenoles were determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method using gallic acid as reference. The results show that the co-active compounds in the daily dose of the pomegranate blend were far below those previously tested and that the photometric assessment is not reliable for the standardisation of study medications. Not pomegranate but the low amount of co-active compounds in the proprietary pomegranate blend was responsible for its clinical ineffectiveness.
两项探索性临床研究调查了专利石榴产品,表明其在增加前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间方面具有一定的效果趋势。最近的一项临床研究不支持这些结果。因此,我们分析了大量市售的石榴混合物中的共活性石榴化合物。采用高效液相色谱法检测 punicalagin、鞣花酸和花青素。采用 Folin-Ciocalteu 法测定总多酚,以没食子酸为参比。结果表明,石榴混合物每日剂量中的共活性化合物远远低于以前测试的水平,而且分光光度评估对于研究药物的标准化不可靠。导致其临床无效的原因不是石榴,而是专利石榴混合物中低含量的共活性化合物。