Barqouni Loai, Abu Shaaban Nafiz, Elessi Khamis
Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 4;2014(6):CD008805. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008805.pub3.
Phosphorus burns are rarely encountered in usual clinical practice and occur mostly in military and industrial settings. However, these burns can be fatal, even with minimal burn area, and are often associated with prolonged hospitalisation.
To summarise the evidence of effects (beneficial and harmful) of all interventions for treating people with phosphorus burns.
In October 2013 for this first update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library);Ovid OLDMEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; EBSCO CINAHL and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S). We did not apply any methodological filters or restrictions on the basis of study design, language, date of publication or publication status.
Any comparisons of different ways of managing phosphorus burns including, but not restricted, to randomised trials.
We found two non-randomised comparative studies, both comparing patients treated with and without copper sulphate.
These two comparative studies provide no evidence to support the use of copper sulphate in managing phosphorus burns. Indeed the small amount of available evidence suggests that it may be harmful.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: First aid for phosphorus burns involves the common sense measures of acting promptly to remove the patient's clothes, irrigating the wound(s) with water or saline continuously, and removing phosphorus particles. There is no evidence that using copper sulphate to assist visualisation of phosphorus particles for removal is associated with better outcome, and some evidence that systemic absorption of copper sulphate may be harmful. We have so far been unable to identify any other comparisons relevant to informing other aspects of the care of patients with phosphorus burns. Future versions of this review will take account of information in articles published in languages other than English, which may contain additional evidence based on treatment comparisons.
磷烧伤在日常临床实践中很少见,主要发生在军事和工业环境中。然而,即使烧伤面积很小,这些烧伤也可能致命,并且常常与长期住院相关。
总结治疗磷烧伤患者的所有干预措施的效果(有益和有害)证据。
2013年10月进行首次更新时,我们检索了Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库;Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆);Ovid OLDMEDLINE;Ovid MEDLINE;Ovid MEDLINE(在研及其他非索引引文);Ovid EMBASE;EBSCO CINAHL和会议论文引文索引 - 科学版(CPCI-S)。我们没有根据研究设计、语言、出版日期或出版状态应用任何方法学筛选或限制。
任何关于磷烧伤不同处理方式的比较,包括但不限于随机试验。
我们找到了两项非随机对照研究,均比较了使用和未使用硫酸铜治疗的患者。
这两项对照研究均未提供证据支持使用硫酸铜治疗磷烧伤。实际上,少量现有证据表明其可能有害。
磷烧伤的急救包括迅速采取的常识性措施,即立即脱掉患者衣物,持续用水或盐水冲洗伤口,并清除磷颗粒。没有证据表明使用硫酸铜辅助可视化磷颗粒以进行清除会带来更好的结果,并且有一些证据表明硫酸铜的全身吸收可能有害。到目前为止,我们未能确定任何与磷烧伤患者护理其他方面相关的其他比较。本综述的未来版本将考虑以英语以外语言发表的文章中的信息,这些文章可能包含基于治疗比较的其他证据。