McSweeney F K, Weatherly J N, Swindell S
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820, USA.
Behav Processes. 1996 Feb;36(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00016-x.
Four rats and four pigeons responded for food delivered by variable interval schedules that provided programmed rates of reinforcement ranging from 15 to 480 reinforcers per hour. Rate of responding increased, decreased, or increased and then decreased within sessions. The within-session pattern of responding changed with changes in the programmed rate of reinforcement and with the species of subject. Finding within-session changes in responding during variable interval schedules extends the generality of these changes to another schedule. It implies that variable interval schedules should be used cautiously as baselines for assessing the effects of other variables, such as drugs. Finally, the results suggest that systematic pauses in responding during the session may contribute to the decreases in the average rates of responding with increases in the rates of reinforcement that are sometimes observed when subjects respond on variable interval schedules that deliver high rates of reinforcement.
四只大鼠和四只鸽子通过可变间隔时间表来获取食物,该时间表提供的强化程序速率范围为每小时15至480次强化。在实验过程中,反应速率增加、减少,或先增加后减少。实验过程中的反应模式随强化程序速率的变化以及实验对象的种类而改变。在可变间隔时间表中发现实验过程中反应的变化,将这些变化的普遍性扩展到了另一种时间表。这意味着在将可变间隔时间表用作评估其他变量(如药物)影响的基线时应谨慎使用。最后,结果表明,在实验过程中反应的系统性停顿可能导致当实验对象在提供高强化速率的可变间隔时间表上做出反应时,随着强化速率的增加,平均反应速率有时会下降。