• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of reinforcer type on rats' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay.

作者信息

Chelonis J J, Logue A W

机构信息

State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1997 Feb;39(2):187-203. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00050-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00050-2
PMID:24896965
Abstract

Twenty rats, divided into two groups, served as subjects in an experiment that examined choices between reinforcers that varied in amount or delay. One group received food reinforcers, and the other water reinforcers. No difference was found between the two groups in their values of sA (tendency of choice behavior to vary in accordance with variation in reinforcer amount). However, Group Food had significantly lower values of sD (tendency of choice behavior to vary in accordance with variation in reinforcer delay) than did Group Water, and Group Food's values of s As D (a measure related to self-control-choices of larger, more delayed over smaller, less delayed reinforcers) tended to be greater than for Group Water. Finally, over the session, sA and s As D showed no significant change, overall response rates decreased, and sD increased. Taken together, these results suggest that, independent of deprivation level, self-control for water is less than self-control for food.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of reinforcer type on rats' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay.
Behav Processes. 1997 Feb;39(2):187-203. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00050-2.
2
Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.调整延迟时间表中对延迟强化物的选择:绝对强化物大小和剥夺水平的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1992 Jul;45(1):1-13.
3
Self-control and impulsiveness in children and adults: Effects of food preferences.儿童和成人的自我控制和冲动性:食物偏好的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jul;64(1):33-46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-33.
4
Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.中枢5-羟色胺耗竭对延迟强化和概率性强化敏感性的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Nov;152(4):390-7. doi: 10.1007/s002130000542.
5
Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.采用调整量程序测定大鼠的折扣函数。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):353-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-353.
6
Delay discounting of qualitatively different reinforcers in rats.大鼠不同质量强化物的延时折扣。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):171-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-171.
7
Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.人类在自我控制选择情境中的选择:对强化物数量、强化物延迟和整体强化密度的敏感度。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):87-102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-87.
8
Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.自我控制选择中对强化物前后延迟的敏感性。
Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.眶额叶皮质损伤对延迟强化和概率强化敏感性的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Mar;160(3):290-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-001-0983-0. Epub 2002 Jan 25.
10
Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures.基于代币的自我控制程序中鸽子选择的决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Mar;79(2):207-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-207.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of methamphetamine on delay discounting in rats using concurrent chains.甲基苯丙胺对使用并发链程序的大鼠延迟折扣的影响。
Learn Behav. 2025 Sep;53(3):232-247. doi: 10.3758/s13420-024-00657-w. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.分布式和累积强化安排:疗效和偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):293-313. doi: 10.1002/jaba.116. Epub 2014 Apr 30.