Priuli Roseana Mara Aredes, Moraes Maria Silvia de, Chiaravalloti Rafael Morais
Departamento de Epidemiologia e Saúde Coletiva, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil.
Departamento de Enfermagem, União das Instituições Educacionais de São Paulo, Mirassol, SP, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Apr;48(2):225-31. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048004798.
Evaluate the impact of stress on sugar cane cutters and the prevalence of physical and psychological symptoms before and after harvest.
We studied 114 sugarcane cutters and 109 urban workers in the pre-harvest and 102 sugar cane cutters and 81 urban workers in the post-harvest period in the city of Mendonça, SP, Southeastern Brazil, in 2009. Data analysis was based on the frequency and percentage of the assessed symptoms of stress, using the Lipp-ISSL test (Symptoms of Stress for Adults). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Fisher Test was used to compare the variable of stress between pre- and post-harvest within the sugar cane cutter and urban worker groups. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
Stress in sugar cane cutters increased after harvesting (34.2% pre-harvest and 46.1% post-harvest); in urban workers, stress decreased from 44.0% pre-harvest to 42.0% post-harvest. There was prevalence of the phase of resistance to stress for both groups with signs more apparent from the near-exhaustion and exhaustion phases for sugar cane cutters. After harvest, there was a tendency for the number of sugar cane cutters with symptoms of near-exhaustion (6.4%) and exhaustion (10.6%) to increase. After harvest there was a trend for the number of sugar cane cutters with physical symptoms (pre-harvest = 20.5%, post-harvest = 25.5%) and psychological symptoms (pre-harvest = 64.1%; post-harvest = 70.2%) to increase. For both groups, predominantly psychological symptoms occurred in both phases (70.2% versus 64.7%).
The work process of cutting cane can cause stress. Individual factors such as cognitive perception of the experience, self-efficacy beliefs and expectations of the employee regarding their performance can influence the understanding of the reactions in their body in face of the work.
评估压力对甘蔗砍伐工人的影响以及收获前后身体和心理症状的患病率。
2009年,我们在巴西东南部圣保罗州门东萨市对114名甘蔗砍伐工人和109名城市工人进行了收获前研究,对102名甘蔗砍伐工人和81名城市工人进行了收获后研究。数据分析基于使用Lipp - ISSL测试(成人压力症状测试)评估的压力症状的频率和百分比。数据采用描述性统计进行分析。Fisher检验用于比较甘蔗砍伐工人组和城市工人组收获前后的压力变量。P值低于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
甘蔗砍伐工人收获后的压力增加(收获前为34.2%,收获后为46.1%);城市工人的压力从收获前的44.0%降至收获后的42.0%。两组均存在压力抵抗阶段,甘蔗砍伐工人从接近衰竭和衰竭阶段的症状更为明显。收获后,出现接近衰竭症状(6.4%)和衰竭症状(10.6%)的甘蔗砍伐工人数量有增加趋势。收获后,出现身体症状(收获前 = 20.5%,收获后 = 25.5%)和心理症状(收获前 = 64.1%;收获后 = 70.2%)的甘蔗砍伐工人数量有增加趋势。两组在两个阶段主要都出现心理症状(70.2%对64.7%)。
砍甘蔗的工作过程会导致压力。个体因素,如对经历的认知感知、自我效能信念以及员工对自身表现的期望,会影响其对面对工作时身体反应的理解。