McSweeney F K, Hatfield J, Allen T M
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4830, USA.
Behav Processes. 1991 Jan;22(3):177-86. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90092-E.
Ten rats pressed levers or keys for food reinforcers delivered by a multiple variable interval schedule. The delay between the end of the session and the delivery of a post-session feeding varied from 0 to 240 minutes. Contrary to the results reported by Bacotti (1976), response rates were not significantly higher when post-session feedings were delayed than when they were immediate. Response rates also increased and then decreased within the session, regardless of the delay to post-session feedings. These results suggest that subjects do not always integrate rewards across locations. Therefore, theories need not always include the temporal location of post-session feedings in the context of variables that determines responding within the session. Experiments must also take care to ensure that changes in response rates within the session do not confound the interpretation of their results.
十只大鼠通过多重可变间隔时间表按杠杆或按键以获取食物强化物。实验结束与实验后喂食之间的延迟从0到240分钟不等。与巴科蒂(1976年)报告的结果相反,实验后喂食延迟时的反应率并不比立即喂食时显著更高。无论实验后喂食的延迟情况如何,反应率在实验过程中也会先增加然后下降。这些结果表明,实验对象并不总是将不同地点的奖励整合起来。因此,理论不一定总是需要在决定实验过程中反应的变量背景下纳入实验后喂食的时间位置。实验还必须注意确保实验过程中反应率的变化不会混淆对结果的解释。