Suppr超能文献

食物剥夺对自我控制的影响。

The effect of food deprivation on self-control.

作者信息

Logue A W, Peña-Correal T E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1985 May;10(4):355-68. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(85)90036-1.

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effect of food deprivation on choice in a discrete-trials self-control paradigm, choice between a larger, more-delayed reinforcer and a smaller, less-delayed reinforcer. In Experiment 1, four pigeons were each deprived to 65%, 80%, and 90% of their free-feeding weights, and the delay to the smaller reinforcer was varied. Deprivation level did not affect choice, but the rate of ineffective key pecks made during the reinforcer delays increased as deprivation increased. In Experiment 2, four pigeons were exposed to conditions in which they were fed up to their 80% free-feeding weights following experimental sessions, and in which they were given no postsession feedings. Both the pigeons' weights and their latencies to insert their heads into the food hopper when food was available were lower when the pigeons were not fed following experimental sessions. Choice showed no change. Deprivation level affects response rate and eating behavior in these procedures, but not choice.

摘要

两项实验在离散试验自我控制范式中考察了食物剥夺对选择的影响,即在一个更大、延迟时间更长的强化物与一个更小、延迟时间更短的强化物之间进行选择。在实验1中,四只鸽子分别被剥夺至其自由进食体重的65%、80%和90%,并改变较小强化物的延迟时间。剥夺水平并未影响选择,但在强化物延迟期间无效啄键的速率随着剥夺程度的增加而增加。在实验2中,四只鸽子被置于以下条件下:实验 sessions 后,它们被喂食至其自由进食体重的80%;以及它们在实验 sessions 后不被喂食。当鸽子在实验 sessions 后不被喂食时,它们的体重以及在有食物时将头伸进食槽的潜伏期都更低。选择没有变化。在这些程序中,剥夺水平影响反应速率和进食行为,但不影响选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验