Beran Michael J, Evans Theodore A, Paglieri Fabio, McIntyre Joseph M, Addessi Elsa, Hopkins William D
Language Research Center, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA,
Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0652-9. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
Self-control has been studied in nonhuman animals using a variety of tasks. The inter-temporal choice (ITC) task presents choices between smaller-sooner (SS) and larger-later (LL) options. Using food amounts as rewards, this presents two problems: (a) choices of the LL option could either reflect self-control or instead result from animals' difficulty with pointing to smaller amounts of food; (b) there is no way to verify whether the subjects would not revert their choice for the LL option, if given the opportunity to do so during the ensuing delay. To address these problems, we have recently introduced a new protocol, the hybrid delay task, which combines an initial ITC with a subsequent accumulation phase in which selection of the SS option leads to its immediate delivery, but choice of the LL option then leads to one-by-one presentation of those items that continues only as long as the subject does not eat any of the accumulated items. The choice of the LL option therefore only reflects self-control when the number of items obtained from LL choices during the accumulation phase is higher than what could be received in the SS option. Previous research with capuchin monkeys demonstrated that their apparent self-control responses in the ITC task may have overestimated their general self-control abilities, given their poor performance in the hybrid delay task. Here, chimpanzees instead demonstrated that their choices for the LL option in the ITC phase of the hybrid delay task were confirmed by their ability to sustain long delays during accumulation of LL rewards.
人们使用各种任务对非人类动物的自我控制进行了研究。跨期选择(ITC)任务呈现了小而早(SS)和大而晚(LL)两种选择之间的抉择。以食物量作为奖励,这带来了两个问题:(a)选择LL选项可能反映了自我控制,也可能是由于动物难以指向较少数量的食物;(b)如果在随后的延迟期间有机会,无法验证受试者是否不会改变对LL选项的选择。为了解决这些问题,我们最近引入了一种新的实验方案,即混合延迟任务,它将初始的ITC与随后的积累阶段相结合,在积累阶段中,选择SS选项会导致其立即交付,但选择LL选项则会导致逐一呈现那些物品,只要受试者没有吃掉任何积累的物品,呈现就会持续。因此,只有当在积累阶段从LL选择中获得的物品数量高于在SS选项中可能获得的数量时,选择LL选项才反映自我控制。先前对卷尾猴的研究表明,鉴于它们在混合延迟任务中的表现不佳,它们在ITC任务中明显的自我控制反应可能高估了它们的一般自我控制能力。在这里,黑猩猩则表明,它们在混合延迟任务的ITC阶段对LL选项的选择通过它们在积累LL奖励期间维持长时间延迟的能力得到了证实。