• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延迟和强化率对离散试验选择的影响。

Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.

作者信息

Mazur J E, Snyderman M, Coe D

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565-75.

PMID:4067510
Abstract

An adjusting procedure was used to measure pigeons' preferences among alternatives that differed in the duration of a delay before reinforcement and of an intertrial interval (ITI) after reinforcement. In most conditions, a peck at a red key led to a fixed delay, followed by reinforcement, a fixed ITI, and then the beginning of the next trial. A peck at a green key led to an adjustable delay, reinforcement, and then the next trial began without an ITI. The purpose of the adjusting delay was to estimate an indifference point, or a delay that made a subject approximately indifferent between the two alternatives. As the ITI for the red key increased from 0 s to 60 s, the green-key delay at the indifference point increased systematically but only slightly. The fact that there was some increase showed that pigeons' choices were controlled by more than simply the delay to the next reinforcer. One interpretation of these results is that besides delay of reinforcement, rate of reinforcement also influenced choice. However, an analysis that ignored reinforcement rate, but considered the delays between a choice response and the reinforcers on subsequent trials, was able to account for most of the obtained increases in green-key delays. It was concluded that in this type of discrete-trial situation, rate of reinforcement exerts little control over choice behavior, and perhaps none at all.

摘要

采用一种调整程序来测量鸽子在不同强化前延迟时间和强化后试间间隔(ITI)的选项之间的偏好。在大多数情况下,啄红色按键会导致固定延迟,随后是强化、固定的ITI,然后是下一次试验的开始。啄绿色按键会导致可调整的延迟、强化,然后下一次试验开始,没有ITI。调整延迟的目的是估计一个无差异点,即一个使受试者在两个选项之间大致无差异的延迟。随着红色按键的ITI从0秒增加到60秒,无差异点处绿色按键的延迟系统性增加,但增加幅度很小。存在一些增加这一事实表明,鸽子的选择不仅仅受限于到下一次强化物的延迟。对这些结果的一种解释是,除了强化延迟外,强化率也影响选择。然而,一种忽略强化率,但考虑选择反应与后续试验中的强化物之间延迟的分析,能够解释所获得的绿色按键延迟增加的大部分情况。得出的结论是,在这种类型的离散试验情境中,强化率对选择行为的控制作用很小,甚至可能根本没有控制作用。

相似文献

1
Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.延迟和强化率对离散试验选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565-75.
2
Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule.固定与可变比率及延迟:等价规则的进一步测试
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986 Apr;12(2):116-24.
3
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.作为离散试验选择因素的强化概率与延迟
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341.
4
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.概率性强化条件下的选择:延迟和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63.
5
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
6
Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.概率强化理论
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):87-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-87.
7
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.延迟和概率性强化物的选择:变异性、试验间隔时间和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):513-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-513.
8
Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.条件性强化以及对延迟和不确定的初级强化物的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):139-50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-139.
9
Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.在调整延迟程序中对确定性和不确定性强化物的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):63-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63.
10
A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.自我控制选择中的延迟与比率要求比较。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):305-15. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-305.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of initiating a pursuit in temporal decision-making.在时间决策中启动追求行为的价值。
Elife. 2025 Mar 28;13:RP99957. doi: 10.7554/eLife.99957.
2
Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.巴甫洛夫条件反射中强化延迟与强化速率的比较
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):203-221. doi: 10.1037/xan0000199. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
3
Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks.在同等的觅食和延迟折扣任务中,大鼠对时间的重视程度有所不同。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1093-101. doi: 10.1037/xge0000196. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
Individual differences in impulsive action and dopamine transporter function in rat orbitofrontal cortex.大鼠眶额皮质中冲动行为与多巴胺转运体功能的个体差异。
Neuroscience. 2016 Jan 28;313:122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.033. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Time discounting and time preference in animals: A critical review.动物中的时间折扣与时间偏好:批判性综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):39-53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0879-3.
6
Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task.重新评估跨期选择:人类在觅食任务中的决策比在自我控制任务中更具优化性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:95. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00095. eCollection 2015.
7
Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons.审判前反应要求对大鼠和鸽子自我控制选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Mar;97(2):215-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-215.
8
Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.并发链程序中单一强化物与多种强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Sep;86(2):211-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.94-05.
9
Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.响应依赖的预选择效应对觅食相关选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May;65(3):619-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-619.
10
A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.一种并发链选择的上下文模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):113-29. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-113.