Suppr超能文献

基于动态血压监测的诊室血压水平及其检测隐匿性高血压的操作特征

Levels of office blood pressure and their operating characteristics for detecting masked hypertension based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

作者信息

Viera Anthony J, Lin Feng-Chang, Tuttle Laura A, Shimbo Daichi, Diaz Keith M, Olsson Emily, Stankevitz Kristin, Hinderliter Alan L

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;

Hypertension Research Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2015 Jan;28(1):42-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu099. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Masked hypertension (MH)--nonelevated office blood pressure (BP) with elevated out-of-office BP average--conveys cardiovascular risk similar to or approaching sustained hypertension, making its detection of potential clinical importance. However, it may not be feasible or cost-effective to perform ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) on all patients with a nonelevated office BP. There likely exists a level of office BP below which ABPM is not warranted because the probability of MH is low.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 294 adults aged ≥ 30 years not on BP-lowering medication with office BP <140/90 mm Hg, all of whom underwent 24-hour ABPM. We calculated sensitivity, false-positive rate, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for the range of office BP cutoffs from 110 to 138 mm Hg systolic and from 68 to 88 mm Hg diastolic for detecting MH.

RESULTS

The systolic BP cutoff with the highest +LR for detecting MH (1.8) was 120 mm Hg, and the diastolic cutoff with the highest +LR (2.4) was 82 mm Hg. However, the systolic level of 120 mm Hg had a false-positive rate of 42%, and the diastolic level of 82 mm Hg had a sensitivity of only 39%.

CONCLUSIONS

The cutoff of office BP with the best overall operating characteristics for diagnosing MH is approximately 120/82 mm Hg. However, this cutoff may have an unacceptably high false-positive rate. Clinical risk tools to identify patients with nonelevated office BP for whom ABPM should be considered will likely need to include factors in addition to office BP.

摘要

背景

隐匿性高血压(MH)——诊室血压(BP)正常但诊室外平均血压升高——所带来的心血管风险与持续性高血压相似或接近,因此对其进行检测具有潜在的临床重要性。然而,对所有诊室血压正常的患者进行动态血压监测(ABPM)可能不可行或不具有成本效益。很可能存在一个诊室血压水平,低于该水平时ABPM并无必要,因为隐匿性高血压的可能性较低。

方法

我们分析了294名年龄≥30岁、未服用降压药物且诊室血压<140/90 mmHg的成年人的数据,所有这些人都接受了24小时ABPM。我们计算了收缩压从110至138 mmHg以及舒张压从68至88 mmHg的不同诊室血压临界值范围用于检测隐匿性高血压的灵敏度、假阳性率和似然比(LRs)。

结果

检测隐匿性高血压时阳性似然比最高(1.8)的收缩压临界值为120 mmHg,阳性似然比最高(2.4)的舒张压临界值为82 mmHg。然而,收缩压120 mmHg时的假阳性率为42%,舒张压82 mmHg时的灵敏度仅为39%。

结论

诊断隐匿性高血压总体操作特征最佳的诊室血压临界值约为120/82 mmHg。然而,该临界值的假阳性率可能高得令人无法接受。识别诊室血压正常且应考虑进行ABPM的患者的临床风险工具可能需要纳入除诊室血压之外的其他因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
An Update on Masked Hypertension.有关掩蔽性高血压的最新信息。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017 Oct 25;19(12):94. doi: 10.1007/s11906-017-0792-4.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验