Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care, OX2 6GG Oxford, UK
Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ. 2018 Jun 27;361:k2478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2478.
To prospectively validate the Predicting Out-of-OFfice Blood Pressure (PROOF-BP) algorithm to triage patients with suspected high blood pressure for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in routine clinical practice.
Prospective observational cohort study.
10 primary care practices and one hospital in the UK.
887 consecutive patients aged 18 years or more referred for ABPM in routine clinical practice. All underwent ABPM and had the PROOF-BP applied.
The main outcome was the proportion of participants whose hypertensive status was correctly classified using the triaging strategy compared with the reference standard of daytime ABPM. Secondary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for detecting hypertension.
The mean age of participants was 52.8 (16.2) years. The triaging strategy correctly classified hypertensive status in 801 of the 887 participants (90%, 95% confidence interval 88% to 92%) and had a sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval 96% to 98%) and specificity of 76% (95% confidence interval 71% to 81%) for hypertension. The AUROC was 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.89). Use of triaging, rather than uniform referral for ABPM in routine practice, would have resulted in 435 patients (49%, 46% to 52%) being referred for ABPM and the remainder managed on the basis of their clinic measurements. Of these, 69 (8%, 6% to 10%) would have received treatment deemed unnecessary had they received ABPM.
In a population of patients referred for ABPM, this new triaging approach accurately classified hypertensive status for most, with half the utilisation of ABPM compared with usual care. This triaging strategy can therefore be recommended for diagnosis or management of hypertension in patients where ABPM is being considered, particularly in settings with limited resources.
前瞻性验证预测诊室外血压(PROOF-BP)算法,以对疑似高血压患者进行分诊,以便在常规临床实践中进行动态血压监测(ABPM)。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
英国的 10 个基层医疗实践和 1 家医院。
887 名连续就诊的年龄在 18 岁及以上患者,因常规临床实践中需要进行 ABPM 而被转诊。所有患者均接受 ABPM 并应用 PROOF-BP。
主要结局是与 ABPM 的日间参考标准相比,使用分诊策略正确分类患者高血压状态的比例。次要结局是检测高血压的敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。
参与者的平均年龄为 52.8(16.2)岁。887 名患者中有 801 名(90%,95%置信区间 88%至 92%)的分诊策略正确分类了高血压状态,其敏感性为 97%(95%置信区间 96%至 98%),特异性为 76%(95%置信区间 71%至 81%)。AUROC 为 0.86(95%置信区间 0.84 至 0.89)。与常规实践中统一转诊进行 ABPM 相比,使用分诊策略可使 435 名患者(49%,46%至 52%)转诊进行 ABPM,其余患者则根据诊所测量结果进行管理。其中,69 名患者(8%,6%至 10%)接受了不必要的治疗,若他们接受 ABPM 则可能不需要接受这些治疗。
在接受 ABPM 检查的患者人群中,这种新的分诊方法可准确分类大多数患者的高血压状态,与常规护理相比,ABPM 的使用减少了一半。因此,在考虑进行 ABPM 的情况下,特别是在资源有限的环境中,这种分诊策略可用于高血压的诊断或管理。