• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
2
3
Stakeholder-engaged co-design and implementation of web-based tools to enhance the dissemination and implementation of AHRQ EPC reports.利益相关者参与的基于网络工具的协同设计与实施,以加强美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)循证实践中心(EPC)报告的传播与实施。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Aug 23;7(2):e10326. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10326. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.评估系统评价对未来研究的影响:两个案例研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Jul;1(4):329-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.28.
5
6
7
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update为医疗保健研究与质量局的有效医疗保健计划评估医疗保健干预措施时证据体强度的分级:最新进展
8
9
Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions评估医疗保健干预系统评价中个体研究的偏倚风险
10

PMID:24901180
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a pilot project to evaluate the use of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) comparative effectiveness reviews in clinical point-of-care tools.

METHODS

We selected a sample of AHRQ EPC comparative effectiveness reviews, traced reports to publications, and reviewed relevant evidence summaries from three clinical point-of-care tools (DynaMed, UpToDate, and First Consult) for citation of reports or publications.

RESULTS

We found moderate use of AHRQ EPC comparative effectiveness reviews in the three clinical point-of-care tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of AHRQ EPC products was moderate, and no clear patterns were identified in this pilot project. Results should be used to develop more comprehensive assessments of the use of AHRQ EPC comparative effectiveness reviews in the increasingly popular clinical point-of-care tools.

摘要