• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者参与的基于网络工具的协同设计与实施,以加强美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)循证实践中心(EPC)报告的传播与实施。

Stakeholder-engaged co-design and implementation of web-based tools to enhance the dissemination and implementation of AHRQ EPC reports.

作者信息

Shelton Erica, Mossburg Sarah, Thompson Lee, Savitz Lucy

机构信息

Health Division American Institutes for Research (AIR) Rockville Maryland USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA.

出版信息

Learn Health Syst. 2022 Aug 23;7(2):e10326. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10326. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/lrh2.10326
PMID:37066098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10091196/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A mission-critical aspect of learning health systems (LHSs) is the provision of evidence-based practice. One source of such evidence is provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) through rigorous systematic reviews, termed evidence reports that synthesize available evidence on nominated topics of interest. However, the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program recognizes that the production of high-quality evidence reviews does not guarantee or promote their use and usability in practice.

METHODS

To make these reports more relevant to LHSs and promote evidence dissemination, AHRQ awarded a contract to the American Institutes for Research (AIR) and its Kaiser Permanente ACTION (KPNW ACTION) partner to design and implement web-based tools to meet the gap in dissemination and implementation of EPC reports in LHSs. We used a co-production approach to accomplish this work across three phases of activity: planning, co-design, and implementation between 2018 and 2021. We describe the methods and results and discuss implications for future efforts.

RESULTS

Web-based information tools that provide clinically relevant summaries with clear visual representations from the AHRQ EPC systematic evidence reports may be used by LHSs to increase awareness and accessibility of EPC reports, formalize and enhance LHSs' evidence review infrastructure, develop system-specific protocols and care pathways, improve practice at the point of care, and train and educate.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-design of these tools and facilitated implementation generated an approach to making EPC reports more accessible and allows for more widespread application of systematic review results in supporting evidence-based practices in LHSs.

摘要

引言

学习型健康系统(LHS)的一个关键任务是提供循证实践。医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)通过严格的系统评价提供了此类证据的一个来源,即证据报告,该报告综合了关于指定感兴趣主题的现有证据。然而,AHRQ循证实践中心(EPC)项目认识到,高质量证据评价的产生并不能保证或促进其在实践中的应用和可用性。

方法

为了使这些报告与LHS更相关并促进证据传播,AHRQ授予美国研究所(AIR)及其凯撒永久医疗行动(KPNW ACTION)合作伙伴一份合同,设计并实施基于网络的工具,以弥补EPC报告在LHS传播和实施方面的差距。我们采用共同生产的方法,在2018年至2021年的三个活动阶段完成这项工作:规划、共同设计和实施。我们描述了方法和结果,并讨论了对未来工作的影响。

结果

基于网络的信息工具可由LHS使用,这些工具提供与临床相关的摘要,并带有来自AHRQ EPC系统证据报告的清晰视觉呈现,以提高对EPC报告的认识和可及性,规范和加强LHS的证据评价基础设施,制定特定系统的方案和护理路径,改善即时护理实践,并进行培训和教育。

结论

这些工具的共同设计和便利的实施产生了一种使EPC报告更易于获取的方法,并允许更广泛地应用系统评价结果,以支持LHS中的循证实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/98467e296d7f/LRH2-7-e10326-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/baf194687cca/LRH2-7-e10326-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/d6502d9b22fe/LRH2-7-e10326-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/98467e296d7f/LRH2-7-e10326-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/baf194687cca/LRH2-7-e10326-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/d6502d9b22fe/LRH2-7-e10326-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4a/10091196/98467e296d7f/LRH2-7-e10326-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholder-engaged co-design and implementation of web-based tools to enhance the dissemination and implementation of AHRQ EPC reports.利益相关者参与的基于网络工具的协同设计与实施,以加强美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)循证实践中心(EPC)报告的传播与实施。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Aug 23;7(2):e10326. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10326. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
3
4
Qualitative evaluation of two web-based tools to improve accessibility of evidence reports.对两种基于网络的工具进行定性评估以提高证据报告的可及性。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 4;7(2):e10341. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10341. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
6
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.评估系统评价对未来研究的影响:两个案例研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Jul;1(4):329-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.28.
9
10
AHRQ EPC Series on Improving Translation of Evidence: Use of a Clinical Pathway for C. Difficile Treatment to Facilitate the Translation of Research Findings into Practice.美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)证据改进翻译系列:利用艰难梭菌治疗的临床路径促进研究结果转化为实践
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;45(12):822-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of two web-based tools to improve accessibility of evidence reports.对两种基于网络的工具进行定性评估以提高证据报告的可及性。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 4;7(2):e10341. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10341. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
NxGen evidence: Redesigning the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Effective Health Care website to promote engagement, interactivity, and usability of systematic reviews.NxGen 证据:重新设计医疗保健研究和质量有效护理机构网站以促进系统评价的参与度、交互性和可用性。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):118-123. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1438. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
AHRQ Series on Improving Translation of Evidence: Perceived Value of Translational Products by the AHRQ EPC Learning Health Systems Panel.美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)关于改善证据翻译的系列报告:AHRQ循证实践中心学习型健康系统小组对翻译产品的感知价值
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Nov;45(11):772-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.08.002.
3
Mind the Gap: Putting Evidence into Practice in the Era of Learning Health Systems.
关注差距:学习型卫生系统时代将证据付诸实践。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2237-2239. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4633-1. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study.提高系统评价效果的采用率:哪种格式最适合医疗保健管理者和政策制定者?一项混合方法研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 22;13(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9.
5
Facilitative Components of Collaborative Learning: A Review of Nine Health Research Networks.协作学习的促进性要素:对九个健康研究网络的综述
Healthc Policy. 2017 Feb;12(3):19-33.
6
Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.弥合研究与实践之间的差距:传播和实施研究的模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):337-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.