1Department of Surgery, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain 2Department of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway 3Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway 4Department of Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain 5Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 6Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital la Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain 7Department of Surgery, Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):811-22. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000026.
A surgical teaching and auditing program has been implemented to improve the results of treatment for patients with rectal cancer.
The aim of this study was to assess the treatment and outcome in patients resected for rectal cancer, focusing on differences relating to the type of resection.
This was an observational study.
The study took place throughout the network of hospitals that compose the National Health Service in Spain.
This study included a consecutive cohort of 3355 patients from the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project. The data of patients who were operated on electively, with curative intent, by anterior resection (n = 2333 [69.5%]), abdominoperineal excision (n = 774 [23.1%]), and Hartmann procedure (n = 248 [7.4%]) between March 2006 and May 2010 were analyzed.
Clinical, pathologic, and outcome results were analyzed in relation to the type of surgery performed.
After a median follow-up time of 37 months (interquartile range, 30-48 months), bowel perforations were found to be more common in the Hartmann procedure (12.6%) and abdominoperineal groups (10.1%) than in the anterior resection group (2.3%; p < 0.001). Involvement of the circumferential resection margin was also more common in the Hartmann (16.6%) and abdominoperineal groups (14.3%) than in the anterior resection group (6.6%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a negative influence on local recurrence, metastasis, survival for advanced stage, intraoperative perforation, invaded circumferential margin, and Hartmann procedure. However, abdominoperineal excision did not significantly influence local recurrence (HR, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.571-1.563; p = 0.825).
The main weakness of this study was the voluntary nature of registration in the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project.
Although bowel perforation and involvement of the circumferential resection margin were more common after abdominoperineal excision than after anterior resection, this study did not identify abdominoperineal excision as a determinant of local recurrence in the context of 3 years of median follow-up.
为了提高直肠癌患者的治疗效果,我们实施了一项外科教学和审核计划。
本研究旨在评估直肠癌患者的治疗效果和结局,并重点关注与手术方式相关的差异。
这是一项观察性研究。
研究在西班牙国民医疗服务体系的网络医院中开展。
本研究纳入了西班牙直肠癌项目中连续队列的 3355 例患者。这些患者均于 2006 年 3 月至 2010 年 5 月期间接受了以治愈为目的的择期手术,包括直肠前切除术(n=2333 [69.5%])、腹会阴联合切除术(n=774 [23.1%])和 Hartmann 手术(n=248 [7.4%]),分析了这些患者的临床、病理和结局数据。
分析不同手术方式的临床、病理和结局结果。
中位随访时间 37 个月(四分位距,3048 个月)时,Hartmann 手术组(12.6%)和腹会阴联合切除术组(10.1%)的肠穿孔发生率明显高于直肠前切除术组(2.3%;p<0.001)。Hartmann 手术组(16.6%)和腹会阴联合切除术组(14.3%)的环周切缘受侵率也明显高于直肠前切除术组(6.6%;p<0.001)。多因素分析显示,Hartmann 手术和腹会阴联合切除术与局部复发、转移、晚期生存、术中穿孔、环周切缘受侵有关,而腹会阴联合切除术并不显著影响局部复发(HR,0.945;95%CI,0.5711.563;p=0.825)。
本研究的主要局限性在于西班牙直肠癌项目的注册为自愿性质。
尽管腹会阴联合切除术的肠穿孔和环周切缘受侵发生率高于直肠前切除术,但在中位随访 3 年的时间内,本研究并未发现腹会阴联合切除术是局部复发的决定因素。