• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Public opinion on nutrition-related policies to combat child obesity, Los Angeles County, 2011.2011年洛杉矶县关于应对儿童肥胖的营养相关政策的公众意见
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 5;11:E96. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140005.
2
Neighborhood Food Environment, Diet, and Obesity Among Los Angeles County Adults, 2011.2011年洛杉矶县成年人的邻里食物环境、饮食与肥胖状况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Sep 3;12:E143. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150078.
3
The effect of school district nutrition policies on dietary intake and overweight: a synthetic control approach.学区营养政策对饮食摄入和超重的影响:综合控制方法。
Econ Hum Biol. 2014 Jan;12:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
4
Where there's a will: can highlighting future youth-targeted marketing increase support for soda taxes?有志者事竟成:强调未来针对年轻人的营销能否增加对汽水税的支持?
Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1610-3. doi: 10.1037/hea0000021. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
5
Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages and unhealthy foods: a qualitative study of key opinion leaders' views.对含糖饮料和不健康食品征税:一项关于关键意见领袖观点的定性研究
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Jul 31;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0240-1.
6
The association of soda sales tax and school nutrition laws: a concordance of policies.汽水销售税与学校营养法的关联:政策的一致性
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Oct;17(10):2201-6. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013003029. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
Economics and obesity policy.经济学与肥胖政策。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Jun;41(6):831-834. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.5. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
Predictors of public support for nutrition-focused policy, systems and environmental change strategies in Los Angeles County, 2013.预测 2013 年洛杉矶县公众对以营养为重点的政策、系统和环境变化战略的支持。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e012654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012654.
9
Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.美国人对减少含糖饮料消费政策的看法。
Prev Med. 2014 Jun;63:52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.是的,政府应该对软饮料征税:澳大利亚公民陪审团的调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Feb 27;11(3):2456-71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110302456.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing childhood obesity through policy: A cross-sectional study in Malta.通过政策解决儿童肥胖问题:马耳他的一项横断面研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2023 Nov 1;64(3):E323-E336. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.3.2938. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Public acceptability of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: repeat cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study (2017-2019).英国软饮料行业征税的公众接受度:国际粮食政策研究(2017-2019 年)的重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 24;11(9):e051677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051677.
3
Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis.征收含糖饮料税的政治和公众接受度:混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 4;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0843-0.
4
Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study.英国成年人对英国软饮料行业征税的支持及其感知效果:国际粮食政策研究的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e026698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026698.
5
Public responses to proposals for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: A thematic analysis of online reader comments posted on major UK news websites.公众对含糖饮料征税提案的回应:对英国主要新闻网站上在线读者评论的主题分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0186750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186750. eCollection 2017.
6
A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of Legal Epidemiology.公共卫生法的跨学科方法:法律流行病学的新兴实践
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:135-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021841. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Survey finds public support for legal interventions directed at health behavior to fight noncommunicable disease.调查发现,公众支持针对健康行为的法律干预措施,以防治非传染性疾病。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):486-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0609.
2
Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary.系统评价儿童食品营销的性质、范围和影响的证据。回顾性总结。
Appetite. 2013 Mar;62:209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 May 2.
3
Predicting support for restricting food marketing to youth.预测对限制向青少年营销食品的支持度。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):419-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0734.
4
Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches.营造健康的食品与饮食环境:政策与环境途径
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:253-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926.

2011年洛杉矶县关于应对儿童肥胖的营养相关政策的公众意见

Public opinion on nutrition-related policies to combat child obesity, Los Angeles County, 2011.

作者信息

Simon Paul A, Chiang Choiyuk, Lightstone Amy S, Shih Margaret

机构信息

Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 3530 Wilshire Blvd, 8th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90010. E-mail:

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 5;11:E96. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140005.

DOI:10.5888/pcd11.140005
PMID:24901796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4049198/
Abstract

We assessed public opinion on nutrition-related policies to address child obesity: a soda tax, restrictions on advertising unhealthy foods and beverages to children, and restrictions on siting fast food restaurants and convenience stores near schools. We analyzed data from 998 adults (aged ≥18 years) in the 2011 Los Angeles County Health Survey. Support was highest for advertising restrictions (74%), intermediate for a soda tax (60%), and lowest for siting restrictions on fast food restaurants and convenience stores (44% and 37%, respectively). Support for food and beverage advertising restrictions and soda taxation is promising for future policy efforts to address child obesity.

摘要

我们评估了公众对解决儿童肥胖问题的营养相关政策的看法

汽水税、限制向儿童宣传不健康食品和饮料以及限制在学校附近开设快餐店和便利店。我们分析了2011年洛杉矶县健康调查中998名成年人(年龄≥18岁)的数据。对广告限制的支持率最高(74%),对汽水税的支持率中等(60%),对快餐店和便利店选址限制的支持率最低(分别为44%和37%)。对食品和饮料广告限制以及汽水税的支持为未来解决儿童肥胖问题的政策努力带来了希望。