Suppr超能文献

迈向无痕手术:从腹腔镜手术到NOTES的复杂性递增分析

Toward scar-free surgery: an analysis of the increasing complexity from laparoscopic surgery to NOTES.

作者信息

Chellali Amine, Schwaitzberg Steven D, Jones Daniel B, Romanelli John, Miller Amie, Rattner David, Roberts Kurt E, Cao Caroline G L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3119-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3565-z. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

NOTES is an emerging technique for performing surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy. Debate about its real benefit over the traditional laparoscopic technique is on-going. There have been several clinical studies comparing NOTES to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, no work has been done to compare these techniques from a Human Factors perspective. This study presents a systematic analysis describing and comparing different existing NOTES methods to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Videos of endoscopic/laparoscopic views from fifteen live cholecystectomies were analyzed to conduct a detailed task analysis of the NOTES technique. A hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and several hybrid transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomies was performed and validated by expert surgeons. To identify similarities and differences between these techniques, their hierarchical decomposition trees were compared. Finally, a timeline analysis was conducted to compare the steps and substeps.

RESULTS

At least three variations of the NOTES technique were used for cholecystectomy. Differences between the observed techniques at the substep level of hierarchy and on the instruments being used were found. The timeline analysis showed an increase in time to perform some surgical steps and substeps in NOTES compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

As pure NOTES is extremely difficult given the current state of development in instrumentation design, most surgeons utilize different hybrid methods-combination of endoscopic and laparoscopic instruments/optics. Results of our hierarchical task analysis yielded an identification of three different hybrid methods to perform cholecystectomy with significant variability among them. The varying degrees to which laparoscopic instruments are utilized to assist in NOTES methods appear to introduce different technical issues and additional tasks leading to an increase in the surgical time. The NOTES continuum of invasiveness is proposed here as a classification scheme for these methods, which was used to construct a clear roadmap for training and technology development.

摘要

背景

NOTES是一种用于实施外科手术(如胆囊切除术)的新兴技术。关于其相对于传统腹腔镜技术的实际益处的争论仍在继续。已经有多项临床研究将NOTES与传统腹腔镜手术进行比较。然而,尚未从人因学角度对这些技术进行比较。本研究进行了系统分析,描述并比较了现有的不同NOTES方法与腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

方法

分析了15例实时胆囊切除术的内镜/腹腔镜视野视频,以对NOTES技术进行详细的任务分析。由外科专家对腹腔镜胆囊切除术和几种经阴道NOTES混合胆囊切除术进行了分层任务分析并验证。为了确定这些技术之间的异同,比较了它们的分层分解树。最后,进行了时间线分析以比较步骤和子步骤。

结果

至少三种NOTES技术变体被用于胆囊切除术。发现在层次结构的子步骤级别以及所使用的器械方面,观察到的技术之间存在差异。时间线分析表明,与腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,NOTES中执行某些手术步骤和子步骤的时间有所增加。

结论

鉴于器械设计的当前发展状态,纯NOTES极其困难,大多数外科医生采用不同的混合方法——内镜和腹腔镜器械/光学设备的组合。我们的分层任务分析结果确定了三种不同的混合方法来进行胆囊切除术,它们之间存在显著差异。在NOTES方法中使用腹腔镜器械协助的不同程度似乎引入了不同的技术问题和额外任务,导致手术时间增加。本文提出了NOTES侵袭性连续体作为这些方法的分类方案,用于构建培训和技术发展的清晰路线图。

相似文献

7
Update in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES).经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)的进展
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;33(5):346-351. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000385.

本文引用的文献

1
Needs analysis for developing a virtual-reality NOTES simulator.开发虚拟现实NOTES 模拟器的需求分析。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1607-16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2637-1. Epub 2012 Dec 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验